MADRAS HIGH COURT
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27/01/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP(MD). No.1551
(MD). No.1551
CRL OP(MD). No.1551 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Date : 27/01/2023
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
CRL OP(MD). No.1551 of 2023
1. Manogaran
2. Jone Vesiley
... Petitioners/Accused
Vs
State Rep.by
The Inspector of Police,
Sethubavachatram Police Station,
Thanjavur District.
Crime No. 8/2023.
... Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioners
: M/s.Anandan.B, Advocate.
For Respondent
: Mr.M.Veeranthiran,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :-
For Bail in Crime No. 8 of 2023 on the file of the respondent
police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioners/A1 and A4, who were arrested and remanded to
judicial custody on 10.01.2023 for the offences punishable under
Section 25(1-A) of Arms Act in Crime No.8 of 2023 on the file of
the respondent police, seek bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along
with other accused said to have threatened the public showing aruval
and on seeing the police they escaped from the scene of occurence.
Hence the case.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would
submit the petitioners are innocent and a false case has been
foisted against them. He would further submit that the petitioners
are in custody from 10.01.2023, hence he seeks bail.
1/3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.1551 of 2023
4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the
respondent would submit that the petitioners along with other
accused has threatened the public showing aruval, hence he objected
to grant bail to the petitioners.
5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on
record including the First Information Report.
6.Taking into consideration of the facts and submissions made
by the learned counsels and also taking into consideration the
period of incarceration this Court is inclined to grant bail to the
petitioners subject to the following conditions:
(a) Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on
bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees
Ten Thousand only)each with two sureties each for a like sum to the
satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,
Peravurani, Thanjavur District and on further conditions that:
(b) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb
Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain
a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their
identity;
(c) the petitioners shall stay at Dindigul and report before
the Dindigul town North Police Station daily at 10.30 am., until
further orders.
(d) the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar
nature;
(e) the petitioners shall not abscond either during
investigation or trial;
(f) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness
either during investigation or trial;
(g) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned
Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate
action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the
conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by
the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR
SCW 5560];
(h) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be
registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/-
27/01/2023
/ TRUE COPY /
27/01/2023
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
AAV
2/3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.