HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Prakash @ Jeyaprakash Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent
CRL OP(MD) 2635/2021
['M/s Susi Kumar C', '', 'Ajaykose C', 'Naresh B', '', 'Joint Compromise memo filed', 'Public Prosecutor', '', 'R Maheswaran', 'R', 'PH']
Crl.O.P(MD)No.2635 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ILANGOVAN
Crl.O.P(MD)No.2635 of 2021
R.Prakash @ Jeyaprakash Narayanan
.. Petitioner/ Accused No.8
Vs
1.State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Kenikarai Police Station,
Ramanathapuram District.
In crime No.526/1999
..1st Respondent/Complainant
2.Kamatchi
.. 2nd Respondent /
Defacto
Complainant
3.Depakaran
..3rd Respondent/ Victim
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal
Procedure, to call for records relating to the charge sheet in PRC
No.11 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II,
Ramanathapuram and quash the same insofar as the petitioner is
concerned.
For Petitioners
: Mr.C.Susikumar
For R1
: Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi
Government Advocate
For R2 & R3
: R.Maheshwaran
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash charge
sheet in PRC No.11 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate
Court No.II, Ramanathapuram insofar as the petitioner is
concerned. The petitioner is facing charges under Sections 147,
148, 323, 324 and 307 IPC.
2.The second respondent / defacto complainant as well as
the petitioner/accused are present before this Court through video
conference and they are identified by the respective learned
counsel and both the parties have filed joint compromise memo
stating that the matters in issue between them has been amicably
resolved. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the co-
accused has been acquitted after full trial in SC No.32 of 2006,
by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram. The second
respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the
case and therefore would pray for quashing the case.
1/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Crl.O.P(MD)No.2635 of 2021
3. The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the
parties are also present at the learned Additional Public
Prosecutor office and their identity has also been verified
through video conference. Since the matters in issue has been
compromised between the parties, no purpose will be served in
keeping the case pending further.
4. In the result, by recording the compromise, this
Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceedings in PRC
No.11 of 2017, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II,
Ramanathapuram is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form
part and parcel of this order.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (AD-I)
// True Copy //
/ /2021
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
vrn
NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic,
a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes,
but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the
correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant
concerned.
To:-
Enclose copy of Joint Compromise Memo.
1.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II,
Ramanathapuram.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Kenikarai Police Station,
Ramanathapuram District.
In crime No.526/1999
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
Crl.O.P(MD)No.2635 of 2021
01.11.2021
RK/NS(22/11/2021) 2P 4C
2/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/