HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Kasi Rajan – Appellant
Versus
The Intelligence Officer – Respondent
CRL MP(MD) 2689/2020
['M/s G Murugendran', '', 'M Ramesh', 'Special Public Prosecutor', '', 'Typed Set of Paper - II filed', 'Objections filed', 'Typed set filed', 'Citations filed']
CRL MP(MD) No.2689 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
RESERVED ON
03.08.2022
PRONOUNCED ON
11.10.2022
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR
CRL MP(MD) No.2689 of 2020
IN
CRL A(MD) No.143 of 2020
KASI RAJAN
... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
Vs
STATE REP.BY
THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU,
MADURAI SUB-ZONE,
MADURAI,
NCB F.NO.48/1/01/2014/NCB/MDU
... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein
and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to
release the petitoner on bail by suspending the sentence appealed
against in C.C.No.99 of 2018 on the file of Principal Special for EC
& NDPS Act cases, Madurai pending disposal of the above appeal.
Prayer in CRL A(MD)No.143 of 2020 :
To take this file an appeal call for records relating to
judgment in C.C.No.99/2018 dated on 09.01.2020 on the file of
Principal Special for EC & NDPS Act Cases, Madurai and set aside the
same and acquit the Appellant from all charges framed against the
petitioner.
Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon
perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the
arguments of M/S.G.MURUGENDRAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of
MR.C.ARUL VADIVEL @ SEKAR, Special Public Prosecutor for NCB Cases
on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend
the sentence passed in C.C.No.99 of 2018, dated 09.01.2020, on the
file of the learned Additional District Judge, Principal Special
Court for EC & NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, till the disposal of this
Criminal Appeal.
2.The case of the prosecution is that on 22.10.2017 at about
02.30 hours, on receipt of the secret information, the respondent
police party went to the spot along with the witnesses and arrested
the accused and seized the contraband at Pannikundu, Usilampatti,
Madurai, and on that basis, FIR came to be registered.
1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP(MD) No.2689 of 2020
3.The respondent police, after completing the investigation,
has filed the final report and the case was taken on file in
C.C.No.99 of 2018 on the file of the Principal Special Court for EC
& NDPS Act Cases, Madurai.
4.During the trial, the prosecution has examined 5 witnesses as
P.W.1 to P.W.5, exhibited 32 documents as Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.32 and
marked 11 material objects as M.O.1 to M.O.11. The defence have
adduced neither oral nor documentary evidence.
5.The learned Additional District Judge, upon considering the
evidence adduced and on hearing the arguments of both the sides, has
passed the impugned judgment dated 09.01.2020 convicting the
petitioner/accused for the offence under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)
(C) of NDPS Act and sentenced him to undergo ten years Rigorous
Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/-, in default, to
undergo six months Simple Imprisonment. Aggrieved by the said
judgment of conviction and sentence, the petitioner has preferred
the present Criminal Appeal along with the above miscellaneous
petition for suspension of sentence.
6.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that
P.W.1 admitted that he met P.W.2 at Chellampatti and the same was
corroborated by P.W.2 but the Ex.P.2 mahazar was prepared at
04.30 p.m., on the spot and it is impossible to reach the spot at
04.30 p.m., as there was a distance of 20 kms between Chellampatti
and Pannikundu and that therefore the recovery itself is doubtful
and false.
7.The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit
that though Ex.P.2 comes within the jurisdiction of the Judicial
Magistrate, Thirumangalam, the accused and the property were not
produced before the concerned Court on 22.10.2017, but the accused
was produced on the