HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J
MUTHUMADASAMY .M – Appellant
Versus
THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL – Respondent
WP(MD)/2831/2022
W.P.(MD)No.2831 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.(MD)No.2831 of 2022
M.Muthumadasamy
...Petitioner
/Vs./
1.The Accountant General,
(Accounts & Entitlements) of Tamil Nadu,
No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018.
2.The District Educational Officer,
Uthamapalayam,
Theni District.
...Respondents
PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st Respondent, of his
proceedings in AG(A&E) / PEN24 / UNIT-1 / PT.NO.8984 dated
22.12.2021 and quash the same and direct to incorporate Mrs.kavitha
as a Nominee of the Petitioner in P22/12208254/3/P.P.O.No.R2208254 /
EDA to receive family pension.
For Petitioner
: Mr.K.P.S.Palanivel Rajan
For R1
: Ms.S.Mahalakshmi
For R2
: Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh
Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The order dated 22.12.2021 issued by the Accountant General of
Tamil Nadu rejecting the request of the petitioner to include the
name of his second wife as nominee in the service records is under
challenge in the present writ petition.
2.The impugned order states that the writ petitioner,
M.Muthumadaswamy has married Smt.M.Kavitha, when his wife is alive.
Thus, Smt.M.Kavitha cannot be incorporated as family pension
beneficiary, as per the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 (in short
'Pension Rules').
3.The facts in nutshell are that the petitioner served as
Assistant and Junior Assistant and retired from service on
31.08.2013 and now receiving pension. The petitioner married one
Smt.Tamil Selvi in the year 1985 and she was diagnosed of suffering
from Blood Cancer and she requested the petitioner to marry her
younger sister Kavitha, as they had two children born out of
wedlock. Accordingly, the petitioner married Smt.M.Kavitha on
1/7
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P.(MD)No.2831 of 2022
29.05.1994, subsequently the first wife of the writ petitioner died
on 18.09.1996.
4.The petitioner was making a request to include the name of
the second wife, Smt.M.Kavitha as nominee in the service records for
the purpose of family pension. The said request was forwarded by
the District Educational Officer, Uttamapalayam. However, the
Accountant General of Tamil Nadu rejected the request on the ground
that the writ petitioner has married Smt.M.Kavitha, when his first
wife is alive.
5.The issues to be considered in this writ petition are that :
(a) whether a Government employee can enter into a contract for
second marriage during the lifetime of the first wife?;
(b) whether in the event of death of the first wife after
solemnizing the second marriage, the second wife would be entitled
to seek her name to be incorporated as nominee in the service
records or not?;
(c) What are all the governing principles with reference to the
Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 (in short
'Conduct Rules') and the Pension Rules, which all are to be
scrupulously followed as far as the Government servants are
concerned?.
6.Rule 19 of the Conduct Rules speaks about the Bigamous
Marriage. Accordingly, no Government servant shall enter into or
contract a marriage with a person having a spouse living and no
Government servant having a spouse living shall enter into or
contract a marriage with any person.
7.Sub-Rule (2) to Rule 19 stipulates that no Government servant
involve himself in any act involving moral turpitude on his part
including any unlawful act, which may cause embarrassment or which
may bring discredit to Government.
8.As far as the Government servants are concerned, the Conduct
Rules are applicable and the offence of bigamous marriage under the
Indian Penal Code cannot be compared with the Conduct Rules, as they
pla