HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. SOUNTHAR
E.V.NAGARATHINAM (DIED) – Appellant
Versus
P.INDURANI – Respondent
CMP(MD)/2504/2020
C.M.P(MD) Nos.2504, 2505 and 2507 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Third day of January Two Thousand and
Twenty Three
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.SOUNTHAR
C.M.P(MD) Nos.2504, 2505 and 2507 of 2020
in
S.A.No.827 of 2002
1 E.V.NAGANATHAN (DIED)
... DECEASED SOLE APPELLANT
IN ALL THE PETITIONS
2 LOKAMATHA
3 JOTHI MUTHU RAMALINGAM
4 KRISHNAMOORTHY
... PETITIONERS 2 TO 4/
PROPOSED APPELLANTS 2 TO 4
(LRs OF THE SOLE APPELLANT)
IN ALL THE PETITIONS
Vs
1 P.INDURANI
2 UKKIRA PANDIYAN
3 N.MUTHURATHINAM
4 NAGAJOTHI
5 DEIVARANI
6 MANIKANDAN
7 VASUKI
8 N.INDURANI
9 GANDHI MEENAL
10 P.PONUCHAMY THEVAR(DIED)
11 A.SIVAGNANAM
12 MURUGESAN
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P(MD) Nos.2504, 2505 and 2507 of 2020
13 NATARAJA THEVAR
14 MAYILVASAGAM
15 T.PANDI
16 PONNUSAMY @ UKKIRAPANDI THEVAR
17 R.KASINATHADURAI
18 DHANALAKSHMI
19 POOMALAI
S/O.PERIYANATHA THEVAR
20 SATHYA MURTHY
21 SANKARA IYER
... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
IN ALL THE PETITIONS
22 UTHAMARAMAN
23 POOMALAI
D/O.LATE.PONNUSAMY THEVAR
24 NAGU
25 VELLAIMMAL
... RESPONDENTS 22 TO 25/
PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 22 TO 25
(LRs OF 10th RESPONDENT)
IN ALL THE PETITIONS
(RESPONDENTS 12,16,17 AND 19 WERE
DELETED AND ITSELF 21st RESPONDENT
STOOD EX-PARTE BEFORE THE APPELLATE
COURT, HENCE NOTICE MAY BE GIVEN UP)
PRAYER IN CMP(MD).2504/2020:
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein
and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased
to condone the delay of 5928 days in filing the petition for set
aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellate in
the above Second Appeal No.827/2002.
Prayer in CMP(MD). 2505/ 2020 :
To set aside the abatment caused due to the death of the sole
appellate in the above second appeal No.827/2002 in so far as the
sole appellate in concerned.
Prayer in CMP(MD). 2507/ 2020 :
To bring on record the petitioners 2 to 4 as legal
representative of the deceased E.V.Naganathan the sole appellate and
rank them as Appellants 2 to 4 in the above second appeal
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P(MD) Nos.2504, 2505 and 2507 of 2020
No.827/2002.
PRAYER IN SA.No.827/2002:
Pleased to set aside the judgement and decree made in
A.S.No.154/97 on the file of Additional District Judge cum Chief
Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram dated 22.06.2000 which
confirms the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.82/93 on the file of
Sub-Court, Ramanathapuram dated 25.03.1996.
ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon
perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and
upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.NATARAJAN, Advocate for the
petitioners in all the Petitions, the court made the following
order:-
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that
the second appeal filed by the deceased sole appellant was dismissed
earlier and a review application was filed by him in Review
Application (MD) No.113 of 2011. It is further submitted that the
sole appellant died pending review application leaving behind the
petitioners 2 to 4 as his legal representatives. The petitioner
filed CMP(MD) No.580 of 2005 to accept the cause title in the review
application and the same was allowed on 07.09.2011. Thereafter, the
review application was allowed and the second appeal is restored to
file. Therefore, there is a delay of 5928 days in filing the
petition to set aside the abatement caused to the second appeal by
the death of the sole appellant.
2. As far as the petition to bring on record the legal
representatives of the deceased parties are concerned, the Court
has to take liberal view while considering the petition to condone
the delay in seeking to set aside the abatement, especially when
legal representatives were allowed