HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
AROKIADOSS.R – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB REGISTRAR – Respondent
WP(MD)/3900/2022
W.P.(MD).No.3900 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 10.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.(MD).No.3900 of 2022
R.Arokiadoss
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Sub Registrar,
O/o.the Joint Registrar-I,
Thanjavur,
Thanjavur District.
...Respondent
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing
the respondent to register the sale deed dated 02.09.2021 executed
by the petitioner and kept as a pending document in P.No.20/2021
dated 03.09.2021 on the file of this respondent office and return
the same after its registration within the period that may be
stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner
: Mr.Ajmal Khan,
Senior Counsel
for M/s.Ajmal Associates
For Respondent
: Mr.S.Shanmugavel
Additional Government Pleader.
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus to direct the
respondent to register the sale deed dated 02.09.2021 executed by
the petitioner and kept as a pending document in P.No.20/2021 dated
03.09.2021 on the file of the respondent and to return the same
after its registration within a time frame to be fixed by this
Court.
2. Heard Mr.Ajmal Khan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for
the petitioner and Mr.S.Shanmugavel, learned Additional Government
Pleader, who accepts notice for the respondent.
3. At the outset, Mr.Ajmal Khan, learned Senior Counsel
appearing for the petitioner would submit that, even though a
positive direction has been sought for by the petitioner requesting
for release of the pending document, namely, the sale deed dated
02.09.2021, which was presented by the petitioner for registration,
the petitioner is now satisfied, if a decision is taken by the
1/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P.(MD).No.3900 of 2022
respondent as to whether the sale deed can be returned to the
petitioner after registration or the registration will have to be
refused.
4. Admittedly, no decision has been taken, despite intimating
the petitioner on 03.09.2021 that the said document is kept pending
in view of the respondent's contention that further scrutiny is
required to be done before registering the document. Even though
the said intimation was given as early as on 03.09.2021, no final
decision has been taken by the respondent till date.
5. On instructions, Mr.Ajmal Khan, learned Senior Counsel
appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is
satisfied if a decision is taken by the respondent one way or the
other. He seeks liberty of this court, in case the respondent takes
an adverse decision against the petitioner, the petitioner may be
permitted to challenge the same in the manner known to the
petitioner under law. It is also contended, that the petitioner has
filed documents along with the Writ Petition, to claim that the
petitioner is the authorised power agent of the owner of the land
which is the subject matter of the sale deed presented by the
petitioner for registration and is the subject matter of this Writ
Petition. He has filed patta, chitta adangal in respect of the said
land to prove the ownership of the petitioner's principal.
6. No prejudice would be caused to the respondent, if a final
decision is taken within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, as
the document has been kept pending ever since 02.09.2021, when the
same was presented for registration.
7. After hearing the submissions made by the respective
counsels, this Court directs the respondent to take a final decision
with regard to the registration of the sale deed presented by the
petitioner for registration, which is the subject matter of this
Writ Petition, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of
receipt of a copy of this order.
8. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed
of. However, liberty is granted to the