SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Arumugam.C – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/s Sivakumar S', '', 'Vijayarajan R', '', 'P SUBBARAJ', 'SPL GOVT PLEADER', '', 'TAKES NOTICE', 'S SHAJI BINO', 'TAKES NOTICE', 'S P MAHARAJAN', 'TAKES NOTICE']

W.P.[MD]No.5340 of 2022

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 14.06.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

and

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

W.P.[MD]No.5340 of 2022

and

W.M.P.[MD]Nos.4351 of 2022

C.Arumugam

: Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Commissioner,

Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department,

Chennai.

2.The District Collector,

Dindigul District,

Dindigul.

3.The Chief Educational Officer,

O/o. The Chief Educational Officer,

Palani Road, Dindigul.

4.The District Educational Officer,

O/o. The Chief Educational Officer,

Palani Road, Dindigul.

5.The Assistant Commissioner,

Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department,

Pandian Nagar,

Dindigul.

: Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for

the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the first

respondent in e.f.vz;.84808/2021/vk; 1 ehs;-20.01.2022 and quash the

same as illegal, arbitrary and contradicted to the provision of law

and consequently directing the respondents 1 and 5 to sanction and

allot the land which is situated in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top