SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mrs Justice R. THARANI
KUBBAMMAL, – Appellant
Versus
N.SANTHANAMUTHU, – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

Heard Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.S.Xavier Rajini, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2.These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed against the orders passed in I.A.Nos.449 and 450 of 2015 in O.S.No.447 of 2012 dated 26.06.2015 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil.

3.The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs and the respondent herein is the defendant in the suit. The petitioners have filed a suit in O.S.No.447 of 2012 seeking for a prayer of declaration and for recovery of B schedule property and for mandatory injunction to remove the construction in the B schedule property. The petitioners filed petitions in I.A.Nos.449 and 450 of 2015 seeking permission to amend the plaint and to reopen the case.

https://hcTsehrveice s.etcrouirtsa.glov .in/Chcoseurvricets/ dismissed both the petitions. Against which, the petitioners have come forward with the present revision petitions.

4.On the side of the petitioners, it is stated that the petitioners wanted to amend the survey number of the suit. It is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner instead of survey no.1179 has mistakenly ment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top