HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR
2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 29/03/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.5746
(MD). No.5746
CRL OP(MD). No.5746 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Date : 29/03/2022
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR
CRL OP(MD). No.5746 of 2022
Selvam ... Petitioner/Accused No.1
Vs
The State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Panavadalichatram Poilce Station,
Tirunelveli.
(Crime No. 190 of 2021). ... Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioner : Mr.Shyllappa Kalyan.N,
Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivakumar,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :-
For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.190 of 2021 on the file of
the respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the
respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 366 IPC,
in Crime No.190 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with
other accused kidnapped the victim girl and on the next day, dropped
her in the bus stand. The respondent Police have secured the victim
girl and registered the case.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as
alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the
petitioner and the victim girl were on love and on the date of her
birth day, she had accompanied the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing
for the State would submit that the victim girl is aged 17 years and
that the petitioner with the help of his friends kidnapped the
victim girl. He would further submit that the accused 2 and 3 were
already granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.OP(MD)No.3671
of 2022.
1/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
CRL OP(MD). No.5746 of 2022
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also
the fact that the investigation is almost completed as stated by the
learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), that the co-accused
were already granted anticipatory bail by this Court and that the
petitioner is not having any bad antecedents, this Court is inclined
to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain
conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail
in the event of her arrest or her appearance, within a period of
fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order,
before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, on
condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of
Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties,
each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or
to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction
of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:
a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their
photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the
Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book
to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police
daily at 10.30 am for a period of one month and thereafter, as and
when required for interrogation.
(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness
either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation
or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned
Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action
against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions
have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned
Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)i