MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DHARMARAJ, – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP – Respondent
O R D E R
The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.802 of
2011 on the file of III Additional Munsif Court, Trichy and in the suit, the revision petitioners/plaintiffs sought for permanent injunction among various other reliefs. During pendency of the suit, the defendant/respondent herein has filed an application in I.A.No.81 of 2012, praying to set aside the exparte order passed in I.A.No.274 of 2011, in and by which, an exparte order of temporary injunction was passed and the said application was in the interest of justice allowed by the Trial Court. Challenging the said order, the petitioners are before this Court.
2. It is the case of the revision petitioners that the Society by name Anbil Mandram was not registered and the suit property in which the society is located is a punja tharisu belonging to the Government and not assessed to tax. In order to protect the property, the members of Madnram decided to construct a building for using as library, park etc. The Mandram and the members are in possession and enjoyment of the property and the property was subsequently assessed to tax. It is the further case of the revision petitioners that now the Government has been ta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.