SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DHARMARAJ, – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP – Respondent


O R D E R

The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.802 of

2011 on the file of III Additional Munsif Court, Trichy and in the suit, the revision petitioners/plaintiffs sought for permanent injunction among various other reliefs. During pendency of the suit, the defendant/respondent herein has filed an application in I.A.No.81 of 2012, praying to set aside the exparte order passed in I.A.No.274 of 2011, in and by which, an exparte order of temporary injunction was passed and the said application was in the interest of justice allowed by the Trial Court. Challenging the said order, the petitioners are before this Court.

2. It is the case of the revision petitioners that the Society by name Anbil Mandram was not registered and the suit property in which the society is located is a punja tharisu belonging to the Government and not assessed to tax. In order to protect the property, the members of Madnram decided to construct a building for using as library, park etc. The Mandram and the members are in possession and enjoyment of the property and the property was subsequently assessed to tax. It is the further case of the revision petitioners that now the Government has been ta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top