HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
Kalanjiyathal – Appellant
Versus
State through – Respondent
WP(MD)/8060/2022
W.P(MD)No.8060 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 29.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.P(MD)No.8060 of 2022
Kalanjiyathal
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.State through
The Additional Chief Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Home (Prison - IV) Department,
Fort St George,
Chennai.
2.The Inspector of General of Prisons,
Chennai.
3.The Deputy Inspector of General of Prison,
Central prison, Madurai.
4.The Superintendent,
Madurai Central Prison,
Madurai.
...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the
respondents 2 to 4 to forward the representation dated 08.11.2021
made on behalf of the petitioner to the first respondent with
further order or direction in the nature of a writ directing the
first respondent to pass necessary orders within the time frame
stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ananthapadmanabhan
for APN Law Associates
For Respondents
: Mr.S.Ravi,
Additional Public Prosecutor.
O R D E R
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
AND
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
The petitioner seeks a writ of Mandamus directing the
respondents to consider his representation dated 08.11.2021 for
premature release.
1/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P(MD)No.8060 of 2022
2. Mr.N.Ananthapadmanabhan, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner would contend that the trial Court has directed that
the case of the petitioner should not be considered for premature
release till 20 years. Since the petitioner has completed 20 years
of incarceration, as of now, he would be eligible for consideration
of premature release.
3. Mr.S.Ravi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, upon
instructions, would submit that the petitioner has completed 19
years 6 months and 12 days as on 25.04.2022. According to the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor, that difference occurs because
the petitioner availed ordinary leave for six (6) times.
4. In view of the same, this writ petition is disposed of
with a direction to consider the application of the petitioner for
premature release after expiry of twenty years period. It is open
to the petitioner to make another representation after expiry of
twenty years period.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-I)
// True Copy //
/ /2022
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
rm
To:
1.The Additional Chief Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Home (Prison - IV) Department,
Fort St George, Chennai.
2.The Inspector of General of Prisons,
Chennai.
3.The Deputy Inspector of General of Prison,
Central prison, Madurai.
4.The Superintendent,
Madurai Central Prison, Madurai.
5.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
W.P(MD)No.8060 of 2022
29.04.2022
RD(23.05.2022) 2P 6C
2/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/