HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Palanichamy – Appellant
Versus
The Director – Respondent
WP(MD) 15377/2022
['M/s Vadivelan T', '', 'Silambarasan M', '']
W.P.(MD)No.15377 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 18.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
AND
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
W.P.(MD)No.15377 of 2022
Palanichamy
: Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Director
Rural Development and Panchayatraj Department
Panagal Building
Jeenis Road, Saidapet
Chennai 600 015.
2.The District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayats,
Sivagangai District
Sivagangai
3.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat)
S.Pudur Panchayat Union,
Singampunari Taluk
Sivagangai District.
4.R.Selvam
: Respondents
PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st and 2nd
respondents to take necessary action for committed misappropriation in
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.15377 of 2022
the panchayat accounts, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment
guarantee scheme (MGNREGS) and Pradhan Mantry Gramin Awas
Yojana (PMAY) scheme during the year 2016 to 2020 in Varappur
Village Panchayat, S.Pudur Panchayat Union, Sivagangai District on the
basis of petitioner's representations dated 10.02.2022 within a time frame
that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner
: Mr.T.Vadivelan
For Respondents
: Mr.SRA.Ramachandran
for R1 to R3
Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.)
Alleging that the fourth respondent has misappropriated some
funds from the panchayat accounts in connection with MGNREGS and
PMAY, the petitioner gave a representation dated 10.02.2022 and has
thereafter filed the present public interest litigation for a direction to the
respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation.
2.Today, Mr.M.Jeyasurya, Zonal Deputy Block Development
Officer (Zone – 1), Panchayat Union, S.Pudur Bock, Sivagangai District
is present.
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.15377 of 2022
3.This Court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
perused the representation as well the averments in the affidavit of the
petitioner in support of the prayer. We find that the petitioner has not
made any specific allegation of misappropriation and has instead made
vague allegations, based on which, a direction cannot be issued. That
apart, even according to the petitioner, the allegation period relates to
2016 to 2020. In fact, as held by the Supreme Court in Secretary, Minor
Irrigation v. Sahangoo Ram Arya [(2002) 5 SCC 521, a direction cannot
be issued in order to find out if a person has committed an offence, as
that would be in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. In
such view of the matter, we find no merit in this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
[P.N.P., J.] & [R.H., J.]
18.07.2022
Internet
: Yes
RR
3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.15377 of 2022
To
1.The Director
Rural Development and Panchayatraj Department
Panagal Building
Jeenis Road, Saidapet
Chennai 600 015.
2.The District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayats,
Sivagangai District
Sivagangai
3.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat)
S.Pudur Panchayat Union,
Singampunari Taluk
Sivagangai District.
4/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.15377 of 2022
P.N.PRAKASH, J
AND
R.HEMALATHA, J
RR
Order made in
W.P.(MD)No.15377 of 2022
18.07.2022
5/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis