HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mrs Justice J. NISHA BANU
PREM BALAJI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(MD)/9615/2021
W.P(MD)No.9615 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :04.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
W.P(MD)No.9615 of 2021
Prem Balaji
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Tuticorin District,
Tuticorin.
2.The Assistant Director of Town Panchayat,
Tirunelveli Region,
Tirunelveli.
3.The Executive Officer,
Eral Selection Grade Town Panchayat,
Tuticorin District.
... Respondents
PRAYER:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the
third respondent herein to waive the payment of Lease amout for the
lockdown period from 16.03.2020 to 30.09.2020 in respect of lease of
collection entry fee in weekly Shandy situated at the third
respondent Town Panchayat and refund the waiver amount to the
petitioner within the time stipulated by this Court by considering
the petitioner's representation dated 28.04.2021 and for other
reliefs.
For Petitioner
: Mr.J.Lawrance
For Respondents : Mr.P.Thillak Kumar,
Standing Counsel for Government
O R D E R
Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the Government,
accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal
at the admission stage itself.
3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking
for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent
herein to waive the payment of Lease amout for the lockdown period
from 16.03.2020 to 30.09.2020 in respect of lease of collection
entry fee in weekly Shandy situated at the third respondent Town
Panchayat and refund the waiver amount to the petitioner, within the
1/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P(MD)No.9615 of 2021
time stipulated by this Court, by considering the petitioner's
representation dated 28.04.2021 and for other reliefs.
4. The case of the petitioner is that he is a registered
contractor of the third respondent Town Panchayat and he is doing
business, collecting entry fee from the shops, stalls, weekly
shandies and others, in Eral Town Panchayat, with a valid licence.
He has been regularly paying licence fee to the respective local
bodies. In respect of granting licence to collect entry fee at Eral
Town Panchayat for the year 2019-2020, a notification was issued by
the third respondent, pursuant to which, an auction was conducted on
25.02.2019, in which, he was declared as the highest bidder, which
was confirmed by the third respondent vide proceedings dated
25.03.2019 in Na.Ka.No.17/2019 and he has paid a sum of
Rs.19,01,100/- as licence fee for the period from 01.04.2019 to
31.03.2020 and also paid the deposit amount. Furthermore, the lease
is renewable for further period of two years and the annual
enhancement of the licence fee is 5% of the existing licence fee.
Therefore, he was permitted to continue his business during 2020 –
2021 having paid a sum of Rs.20,55,932/-. During covid-19 pandemic
lockdown period from 24.03.2020 to 30.09.2020, he was not in a
position to collect entry fees, due to which he suffered loss in his
business. Therefore, he made a representation to the third
respondent to extend the lease period for further period of seven
months on 21.01.2021, but the third respondent has not considered
his representation and hence, he has sent another representation to
the respondents 1 and 2 in this regard on 03.02.2021. In the said
circumstances, the third respondent vide proceedings dated
26.03.2021, in Na.Ka.No.156/2020/A1, instructed him to renew the
lease period for further period of one year 2021-2022 paying a sum
of Rs.18,26,054/-. But, due to loss in the lockdown period, he has
not chosen