SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mrs Justice J. NISHA BANU
N.Nithya – Appellant
Versus
Karmegam – Respondent


ORDER

The above revision petition has been filed against the dismissal of the petition filed in I.A.No.38 of 2018 in HMOP.No.108 of 2012 to condone the delay of 1923 days in filing the petition to set aside the exparte order passed on 28.02.2013.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the respondent/husband filed HMOP.No.108/2012 seeking restitution of conjugal rights which was allowed exparte on 28.02.2013 and to set aside the exparte order, the revision petitioner/wife filed I.A.No.38/2018 to condone the delay of 1923 days in filing the petition to set aside exparte order stating that she was suffering from jaundice and was taking native treatment in her home and therefore, she could not contact the advocate and due to her inability to engage the advocate, she approached the legal services committee and through the legal aid counsel, she filed the above condone delay petition, but the learned Judge erroneously dismissed the condone delay petition. Hence, this petition.

3.The learned counsel for the respondent would state that the above exparte order was brought to the knowledge of the petitioner/wife on 03.05.2014 itself in the presence of village panchayatars a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top