MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mrs Justice J. NISHA BANU
N.Nithya – Appellant
Versus
Karmegam – Respondent
ORDER
The above revision petition has been filed against the dismissal of the petition filed in I.A.No.38 of 2018 in HMOP.No.108 of 2012 to condone the delay of 1923 days in filing the petition to set aside the exparte order passed on 28.02.2013.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the respondent/husband filed HMOP.No.108/2012 seeking restitution of conjugal rights which was allowed exparte on 28.02.2013 and to set aside the exparte order, the revision petitioner/wife filed I.A.No.38/2018 to condone the delay of 1923 days in filing the petition to set aside exparte order stating that she was suffering from jaundice and was taking native treatment in her home and therefore, she could not contact the advocate and due to her inability to engage the advocate, she approached the legal services committee and through the legal aid counsel, she filed the above condone delay petition, but the learned Judge erroneously dismissed the condone delay petition. Hence, this petition.
3.The learned counsel for the respondent would state that the above exparte order was brought to the knowledge of the petitioner/wife on 03.05.2014 itself in the presence of village panchayatars a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.