SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
JOHNSON – Appellant
Versus
VARGHESE – Respondent


ORDER

This petition has been filed to set aside the order passed in CMP.No.4030 of 2016 in STC.No.738 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate I, Padmanabhapuram dated 07.06.2018.

2.The grievance of the revision petitioner is that while prosecuting the respondent herein in a private complaint, arising out of Negotiable Instrument Act, during the midst of the trial, he came to know that the cheque issued by the accused is not related to the account maintained by him, but an account maintained by one Vanajakumari. The said fabrication act of fraud came to his knowledge only in the course of the trial. Therefore, the case which is tried as summary trial case has to be converted into warrant procedure case. Accordingly, he has filed an application under Section 259 Cr.P.C, but, the trial Court after considering the plea, has dismissed the petition on the ground that for conversion of summary trial case into warrant case there must be prima facie materials. Sofar as the averment made in the private complaint which is subject matter of STC.No.738 of 2016, prima facie material is only with respect to issuance of cheque and its dishonoring for want of fund. For the other allegations n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top