HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE TAMIL NADU CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
aspt balakrishnan – Respondent
CRP(MD) 1022/2022
['m/s g mohan kumar', '', 'l siva', 'M/S M PRABHU', '', 'DT SR', 'K RAJENDRA PRASAD', 'M/S A S BAALAJI', 'P PANDIA RAJAN', 'M/S N SHANMUGA SELVAM', 'SR DT', 'R ANBUKARASU', 'M/S S SENTHIL', 'FOR R SR DT', 'N VIGNESH', 'M/S H ARUMUGAM', 'VIDE COURT ORDERED DT']
CRP(MD)Nos.1022 to 1024 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(MD)Nos.1022 to 1024 of 2022
and
CMP(MD)Nos.4073, 4078, 4079, 4081 of 2022
The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.,
Rep. by its Managing Director,
No.12, Thambusamy Road,
Kilpauk,
Chennai – 600 010.
: Petitioner in all CRPS
Vs.
1.ASPT Balakrishnan
2.M/s.Zinc Foods Pvt Ltd.,
Rep. by its Director,
3/127-D-1, Swamy Nagar,
Salem Road,
Namakkal – 637 001.
3.M/s.Arnica Enterprises Pvt Ltd.,
Rep. by its Director,
First Floor, Harini Complex,
Perundurai Road,
Thindal Medu,
Erode – 638 012.
4.Sikkandar Syed Kathar
: Respondents in all CRPs
1/5
CRP(MD)Nos.1022 to 1024 of 2022
COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India to call for the records pertaining to the orders dated
20.04.2022 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Dindigul, in I.A.Nos.1
to 3 of 2022, respectively, in O.S.No.156 of 2022 and set aside the same.
For Petitioner
:
Mr.Kabir Khan,
Senior Counsel
for Mr.G.Mohan Kumar
For Respondents :
Mr.Balaji for R.1
Mr.Meenakshi Sundaram,
Senior Counsel
for Mr.R.Senthil for R.2
Mr.H.Arumugam for R.3
Mr.M.Ajmal Khan,
Senior Counsel
for Mr.N.Shanmugaselvan for R.4
*****
COMMON ORDER
The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Limited is the petitioner herein.
They have entered into a contract dated 07.01.2020 with the respondents 2 & 3
herein for the movement of goods. The respondents 2 & 3, in turn, have entered
into sub-contract and issued work orders on 10.01.2020 and 18.01.2020,
respectively, with the first respondent for the movement of goods.
2/5
CRP(MD)Nos.1022 to 1024 of 2022
2.According to the first respondent, the respondents 2 & 3, instead of
assigning the transportation works to him, have entered into a new contract with
the fourth respondent for the transportation works. Therefore, he filed a suit in
O.S.No.156 of 2022 before the Principal District Court, Dindigul, seeking
compensation; permanent injunction not to terminate any contract, not to modify
or delete the method of operation and transportation, not to appoint any new
transport contractor. The first respondent has also filed three interlocutory
applications in I.A.Nos.1 to 3 of 2022 seeking interim injunction and the learned
Principal District Court, Dindigul, by order dated 20.04.2022, has granted an order
of ad-interim injunction. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner / Tamil Nadu
Civil Supplies Corporation [TNCSC] has moved the instant revision petitions.
3.When the civil revision petitions came up for admission, this Court has
raised a plea as to how the first respondent, who is an alien to the agreement
entered into between TNCSC and the respondents 2 & 3, has filed a suit and
obtained an interim order of injunction as against TNCSC, causing huge loss to
the Corporation. The matter was thereafter argued in detail and was subsequently
adjourned.
3/5
CRP(MD)Nos.1022 to 1024 of 2022
4.Today, it is represented by the learned Counsel appearing for the first
respondent that they have not pressed the suit and as such, the suit in O.S.No.156
of 2022 was dismissed as not pressed on 27.07.2022.
5.Since the very suit itself is no more, nothing survives for further
adjudication and accordingly, these civil revision petitions stand closed. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
Index
: Yes / No
02.12.2022
Internet
: Yes
gk
To
The Principal District Judge,
Dindigul.
4/5
CRP(MD)Nos.1022 to 1024 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
gk
CRP(MD)Nos.1022 to 1024 of 2022
02.12.2022
5/5