SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
JEYARAMAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF – Respondent


O R D E R

The case was registered against the Petitioners in Crime No.587 of 2013 dared 20.10.2013, for the alleged offence under Sections 294(B), 323 and 353 of IPC., and under Section 3(1)(X) of SC/ ST (POA) Act, as Special S.C.No.42 of 2015, before the III Additional District Judge (PCR Cases) Madurai, for trial.

2. The respondent filed the impugned petition before the said Court to amend the name of the witnesses shown as L.W.7 and L.W.8 in the charge sheet, who were said to be the issuing authorities of the Community / Caste Certificate in respect of the petitioners herein respectively as Thiru Anish Sathar and Thiru Manivannan. The Deputy Tahsildar, Headquarters at Thirumangalam Taluk Office since it was found that L.W.7 and L.W.8 were wrongly mentioned in the list of witnesses annexed with the charge sheet after hearing the objections of the revision petitioners herein, the trial Court passed the impugned order permitting the prosecution to examine them as additional witnesses in the case instead of amending the names of L.W.7 and L.W. The present Revision is against the order passed by the Court below.

3. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top