SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
V.SUMATHI, – Appellant
Versus
R.RAMESH, – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition to set aside the fair order and decreetal order, dated 28.04.2016 made in I.A.No.578 of 2015 in O.S.No.191 of 2012 on the file of the Vth Additional District Court, Madurai.

2.The petitioner is the defendant. The respondent is the plaintiff. The respondent filed O.S.No.191 of 2012 for specific performance of agreement of sale, dated 07.10.2011. During chief- examination of respondent as P.W.1, the agreement of sale, dated 07.10.2011 was marked as Ex.A1. The learned counsel for the petitioner cross-examined the respondent and his evidence was closed. The suit was posted for petitioner's side evidence. At that time, the petitioner filed I.A.No.160 of 2015 for sending Ex.A1 agreement of sale for expert opinion. According to petitioner, Ex.A1 is not original and it is only a Colour Xerox. In the circumstances, the respondent filed I.A.No.578 of 2015 for re-construction of Ex.A1 sale agreement bearing document No.3929/2011, dated 07.10.2011 of Thirupparankundram Sub Registrar Office by substituting certified copy of the sale agreement.

https://hcAsecrvcicoesr.ecdouirtns.ggov .int/hocse rvticehse/ respondent, he filed original agre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top