SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAMASAMY CHETTIYAR,S/O.KOPPULU – Appellant
Versus
SO.SRINIVASAN – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank in the Court below.

2. Claiming themselves as representatives of Agriculturists of

24 Manai Telungu Chettiyargal Uravinmurai at Lingapuram Village, Panthalkudi, the respondent Nos.1 and 2 in C.R.P.(MD).No.581 of 2016 and the petitioners in C.R.P.(MD).No.747 of 2016 / plaintiffs, have filed a suit in O.S.No.283 of 2015 before the District Munsif Court, Aruppukottai, against the revision petitioners in C.R.P.(MD).No.581 of 2016 and the respondents 1 and 2 in C.R.P.(MD).No.747 of 2016 / defendants, who are the representatives of 24 Manai Telungu Chettiyargal Uravinmurai at Lingapuram Street, Panthalkudi Village, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District; Panthalkudi Panchayat Board and Electricity Board. The suit is filed for permanent injunction, restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from interfering with the use of the suit property by the plaintiffs as Kalam (Thrash ground); the 3rd defendant from issuing an order permitting the defendants to put up any construction and the 4th defendant from giving electricity connection for the construction of any building on the suit property and for mandatory inju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top