SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.THAMPI RAJ – Appellant
Versus
DHARMENDRA PRATAP YADAV,I.A.S – Respondent
CONT P(MD) 829/2020



Advocates:
['M/S T JEEN JOSEPH', '', 'PH NO', 'R- DHARMENDRA PRATAP YADAV', 'I A S', 'THE STATE OF TAMULNADU', 'REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY', 'TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT', 'FORT ST GEORGE', 'CHENNAI', '', 'NOTICE SERVED']

Cont.P.(MD) No.829 of 2020

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 13.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

Cont.P.(MD) No.829 of 2020

in

W.P.(MD) No.5492 of 2018

A.Thampi Raj

... Petitioner

-vs-

Dharmendra Pratap Yadav, I.A.S.,

The State of Tamil Nadu

rep.by its Principal Secretary

Transport Department

Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009

... Respondent

PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt

of Courts Act praying to punish the contemnor / respondent for his

wilful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.(MD) No.5492 of 2018,

dated 12.12.2019.

Prayer in WP(MD).No.5492/ 2018 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the

respondents to revise the pension of the petitioners in accordance

with the Clause 11(3) of the Settlement entered under section 12(3)

of Industrial Disputes Act dated 22/01/2011 with an increase at the

rate of 9% from the year 2005 and increase at the rate of 12% from

the year 2007 along with pay revision for the year 2010 and Dearness

Allowance within the time period.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Jeen Joseph

For Respondent : Mr.A.K.Manickam

Government Counsel

O R D E R

This contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful

disobedience of the order, dated 12.12.2019, made in W.P.(MD)

No.5492 of 2018.

2. The learned Government Counsel appearing for the

____________

Page 1 of 2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Cont.P.(MD) No.829 of 2020

respondent submitted that the order and directions issued by this

Court have been complied with and to that effect he has also

produced a copy of the Proceedings in foj vz; .3092/,/2018-6, dated

26.07.2021.

3. The aforesaid proceedings is taken on record. If the

petitioner is still aggrieved, it is open to him to challenge the

same in the manner known to law.

4. In view of the above, the contempt petition is closed.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar (CS III)

// True Copy //

/ /2021

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web

copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,

ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct

copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant

concerned.

To:

Mr.Dharmendra Pratap Yadav, I.A.S.,

The Principal Secretary,

The State of Tamil Nadu,

Transport Department,

Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

+1 CC to M/s.T.JEEN JOSEPH, Advocate ( SR-26447[F] dated

16/08/2021 )

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-26533[F] dated 17/08/2021 )

Cont.P.(MD) No.829 of 2020

in

W.P.(MD) No.5492 of 2018

13.08.2021

MGJ(25.08.2021) 2P 4C

____________

Page 2 of 2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top