SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.J.Michael Murray – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/s Pon Karthikeyan R', '', 'Joseph Sathianeson C', 'Suresh P', '', 'Public Prosecutor']

CRL OP(MD)No.9242 of 2021

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Date : 08/09/2021

PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI

CRL OP(MD)No.9242 of 2021

R.J.Michael Murray

S/o.Robert Murray

... Petitioner/Sole Accused

Vs

The Inspector of Police,,

District Crime Branch

Thoothukudi

Crime No.15 of 2021 ... Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : M/s. Pon Karthikeyan R,

Advocate

For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthilkumar,

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

PRAYER :-

For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.15 of 2021 on the file of the

respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

The petitioner/sole accused apprehending arrest for the offence

under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C, in Crime No.15 of 2021 on the file

of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner approached

the defacto complainant that he would arrange bank loan and he

received more than Rs.10,00,000/- as commission from the defacto

complainant and thereafter, cheated him. Hence, the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top