Advocates:
['M/s Pon Karthikeyan R', '', 'Joseph Sathianeson C', 'Suresh P', '', 'Public Prosecutor']

CRL OP(MD)No.9242 of 2021

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Date : 08/09/2021

PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI

CRL OP(MD)No.9242 of 2021

R.J.Michael Murray

S/o.Robert Murray

... Petitioner/Sole Accused

Vs

The Inspector of Police,,

District Crime Branch

Thoothukudi

Crime No.15 of 2021 ... Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : M/s. Pon Karthikeyan R,

Advocate

For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthilkumar,

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

PRAYER :-

For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.15 of 2021 on the file of the

respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

The petitioner/sole accused apprehending arrest for the offence

under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C, in Crime No.15 of 2021 on the file

of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner approached

the defacto complainant that he would arrange bank loan and he

received more than Rs.10,00,000/- as commission from the defacto

complainant and thereafter, cheated him. Hence, the complaint.

1/3

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

CRL OP(MD)No.9242 of 2021

3.Considering the nature of allegation, this Court by order

dated 18.08.2021, granted interim anticipatory bail to the

petitioner enabling him to appear before the respondent police for

enquiry.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that

the petitioner appeared only one day along with his Advocate and he

did not co-operate with the investigation made by the respondent

police. He would further submit that apart from this case, the

petitioner has involved in thirteen cases which reads as follows:

Sl.No. Police Station

Crime No.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

Chennai CCB

Crime No.101 of 2015 for the offence

under Sections 120(b), 419, 420, 465,

467, 468 and 471 of I.P.C.

Crime No.461 of 2005 for the offence

under Sections 34 and 420 I.P.C

Crime No.189 of 2001 for the offence

under Sections 34, 419, 420, 465 468

and 471 I.P.C.

Crime No.542 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 34, 420, 467, 468 and

471 I.P.C.

Crime No.540 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 34, 420, 467, 468 and

471 I.P.C.

Crime No.539 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 34, 420, 467, 468, and

471 I.P.C.

Crime No.538 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 34, 420, 467, 468, and

471 I.P.C.

Crime No.335 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 120(b), 409, 420, 467,

468 and 471 I.P.C.

Crime No.270 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 120(b), 409, 420, 467,

468 and 471 I.P.C.

2/3

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

CRL OP(MD)No.9242 of 2021

10

11.

12.

13.

Chennai CCB

Crime No.198 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 120(b), 409, 420, 467,

468 and 471 I.P.C.

Crime No.168 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 120(b), 420, 465, 467,

468 and 471 I.P.C.

Crime No.166 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 120(b), 420, 465, 467,

468 and 471 I.P.C.

Crime No.235 of 2000 for the offence

under Sections 120(b), 420, 467, 468

and 471 I.P.C.

5.Considering the antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is

not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/-

08/09/2021

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2021

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

msa

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic,

a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,

ensuring that the c