HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Kanmani – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent
CRL RC(MD) 591 2023
Crl.R.C.(MD).No.591 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 17.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Crl.RC(MD)No.591 of 2023
and
Crl.M.P(MD).No.8564 of 2023
R.Kanmani
... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1. The State rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Dindigul.
(Crime No.76 of 2011)
2. Aswanth Kannan
... Respondents/Complainants
(R2 is suo motu impleaded as per
order of the Court, dated 27.06.2023
in Crl.M.P(MD).No.9082 of 2023)
PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C.,
to call for the records relating to the order, dated 23.03.2023 made in
Crl.M.P.No.547 of 2023 in C.C.No.16 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial
Magistrate Court No.II, Dindigul dismissing the warrant recall petition filed
under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C., by the petitioner and to set aside the same.
1/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD).No.591 of 2023
For Petitioner
: Mr.M. Ajmalkhan
Senior Counsel
for M/s. Ajmal Associates
For 1st Respondent : Mr.T.Senthilkumar
Additional Public Prosecutor
For 2nd respondent : Mr.K.Vinoharan
ORDER
This Criminal Revision is filed to call for the records relating to the order,
dated 23.03.2023 made in Crl.M.P.No.547 of 2023 in C.C.No.16 of 2023 on the
file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Dindigul, dismissing the warrant
recall petition filed under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C., by the petitioner and to quash
the same.
2. The petitioner and other accused are said to have committed offence
under Sections 120B, 406, 420, 466, 471 & 506(i) IPC. Hence, the respondent
police registered the case in Crime No.76 of 2011. After completing
investigation, the respondent police filed the final report before the learned
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul. The petitioner is arrayed as A3. All the
accused filed the quash petition in Crl.O.P(MD)No.13961 of 2016 before this
Court and this Court dismissed the quash petition and dispensed with the
2/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD).No.591 of 2023
personal appearance of all the accused except this petitioner. Thereafter, this
Court issued a direction to split up the case in C.C.No.298 of 2016 as against the
petitioner alone and directed to continue the trial for the remaining accused.
Accordingly, C.C.No.298 of 2016 was split up and C.C.No.16 of 2023 was
assigned as against the petitioner. She did not appear and hence non-bailable
warrant was issued on 21.12.2022 and to recall the same, she filed a petition
under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C., and the same was dismissed. Challenging the said
dismissal order, the petitioner filed this revision petition.
3. This Court by order, dated 27.06.2023 passed the following order in
Crl.M.P(MD).No.9082 of 2023 in Crl.R.C(MD).No.591 of 2023:
“ The above petition has been filed seeking orders
to implead the petitioner / proposed second respondent as
a second respondent in Crl.R.C(MD).No.591 of 2023.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the
learned counsel for the first respondent and the learned
Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the second
respondent.
3.This petition is allowed and the Registry is
directed to carry out the necessary amendments to the
cause title. After making amendment, notice is ordered to
the second respondent returnable by 04.07.2023. Private
3/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD).No.591 of 2023
Notice is also permitted.
4. Post the matter on 04.07.2023.”
4. Thereafter, the case was posted on 04.07.2023. On that day, this Court
passed the following order:
“The petitioner / A3 has filed a petition in
Crl.M.P.No.547 of 2023 before the learned Judicial
Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, to recall the warrant issued
against her.
2.From the record,