HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Alageswaran .A – Appellant
Versus
The Manaing Director – Respondent
WP(MD) 13399/2022
['M/s Malaikani S', '', '', 'Manimegalai M', 'TAKES NOTICE']
W.P(MD).Nos.13399 and 14811 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
W.P(MD).Nos.13399 and 14811 of 2022
and
W.M.P(MD)Nos.9510 and 10594 of 2022
W.P(MD)No.13399 of 2022
A.Alageswaran
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation,
(TASMAC)
CMDA Complex, Egmore,
Chennai-600 008.
2.The District Collector,
Office of the District Collector,
Madurai District.
3.The Senior Regional Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation,
(TASMAC)
Anna Nagar, Madurai-625 020.
4.The District Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation,
(TASMAC)
Madurai North District,
Manalur, Sivagangai District.
...Respondents
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD).Nos.13399 and 14811 of 2022
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents
from shifting the TASMAC retail shop number 5121 from the present place at
Survey No.7/2 A-1, J.J.Nagar, Vandiyur Bit-I, Madurai District and
consequently directing the respondents 1, 3 and 4 to pay rent for shop to the
petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Malaikani
For Mr.A.Mohan
For R1, R3 & R4 : Mr.H.Arumugam
Standing Counsel
For R2
: Mr.P.Subbaraj
Special Government Pleader
W.P(MD)No.14811 of 2022
A.Alageswaran
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation,
(TASMAC)
CMDA Complex, Egmore,
Chennai-600 008.
2.The District Collector,
Office of the District Collector,
Madurai District.
3.The Senior Regional Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation,
(TASMAC)
Anna Nagar, Madurai-625 020.
4.The District Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation,
(TASMAC)
Madurai North District,
Manalur, Sivagangai District.
2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD).Nos.13399 and 14811 of 2022
5.A.Sambathkumar
6.D.Sundaram
...Respondents
(R5 and R6 are impleaded vide Court order dated
26.07.2022 in WMP(MD)No.11744 of 2022)
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, calling for the entire records
connected to the order in Na.Ka.No.710/2022/A5, dated 04.07.2022 passed by
the fourth respondent and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Malaikani
For Mr.A.Mohan
For R1, R3 & R4 : Mr.H.Arumugam
Standing Counsel
For R2
: Mr.C.Satheesh
Government Advocate
COMMON ORDER
The petitioner challenging the order in Na.Ka.No.710/2022/A5, dated
04.07.2022 issued by the fourth respondent. The TASMAC shop situated in
Survey No.7/2 A-1, J.J.Nagar, Vandiyur Bit-I, Madurai District proposed to be
shifted to another place, since the owner of the property sold the property to
some third person to meet his daughter’s marriage expenses. He has written to
the TASMAC as well as District Collector, Sivagangai to shift the shop.
Based on the same, the District Manager sent communication to the shop
supervisor and bar owner of Shop No.5121 to identify new place so that the
Shop No.5121 can be shifted.
3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD).Nos.13399 and 14811 of 2022
2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner’s rental
agreement with one A.Sambathkumar, son of Alagirisamy is for five cents of
land. The petitioner and his brother-in-law jointly entered into a rental
agreement on 03.08.2018 for ground rent. The ground rent was fixed and the
period of tenancy was initially fixed for three years. After entering into the
said rental agreement, the petitioner spent over Rs.15,00,000/- to put up
construction to house, TASMAC retail vending shop and bar attached to it. In
the rental agreement, the petitioner given right to put up construction.