HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hotel Kurunji Meridian – Appellant
Versus
The Debt Recovery Tribunal – Respondent
WP(MD) 13756/2022
W.P.(MD) Nos.13756 to 13758 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 24.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.P.(MD)Nos.13756 to 13758 of 2022
and
W.M.P.(MD)Nos.9762, 9766 and 9765 of 2022
Hotel Kurunji Meridian,
Represented by its Managing Partner,
S.Thangavel
... Petitioners in W.P.(MD)Nos.13756 and
13758 of 2022
S.Thangavel
... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.13757 of 2022
-Vs-
1.The Debt Recovery Tribunal,
4th Floor, Kalyani Tower,
Melur Road, Madurai.
2.The Authorized Officer,
Sundaram Home Finance Limited,
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) Nos.13756 to 13758 of 2022
Registered Office:-
No.21, Patullos Road, Chennai-600 002.
Corporate Office:-
Sundaram Towers,
No.46, Whites Road, Chennai-600 014.
... Respondents
in all W.Ps.
COMMON PRAYER : Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the
impugned 13(4) Notice dated 21.04.2022 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash
the same as illegal.
For Petitioners
: Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth
For R2
: Mr.M.Jerin Mathew
(in all W.Ps.)
COMMON ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.]
Challenging the possession notice dated 21.04.2022 issued by the 2nd
respondent, these Writ Petitions have been filed.
2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel
for the respondent Finance Company submitted that the petitioner has complied
Page 2 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) Nos.13756 to 13758 of 2022
with the conditional interim order of this Court dated 30.06.2022. He fairly
expressed a proposal that if the petitioner approaches the respondent Bank along
with OTS proposal, the same would be considered on merits and in the light of
RBI norms or alternatively, if the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.47,81,252/-
(Rupees Forty Seven Lakhs Eighty One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Two
Only), to the respondent Bank, the loan account of the petitioner would be
regularized. The learned counsel for the petitioner is also agreed to the said
proposal.
3.Recording the aforesaid submission, these Writ Petitions are
disposed of, directing the petitioner to approach the respondent Finance
Company for appropriate relief, within a period of four weeks from the date of
receipt of a copy of this order.
No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[R.M.D., J.] & [J.S.N.P., J.]
24.11.2022
Index
: Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Myr
Page 3 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) Nos.13756 to 13758 of 2022
R.MAHADEVAN
, J.
AND
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
Myr
W.P.(MD)Nos.13756 to 13758 of 2022
24.11.2022
Page 4 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.