SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Sengamalam, – Appellant
Versus
G. Krishnan, – Respondent


AS(MD),No.202 of 2022

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 17.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

AS(MD).No.202 of 2022 and

CMP(MD).No.8993 of 2022

S.Sengamalam

... Appellant/ defendant

Vs.

G. Krishnan

.. Respondent / plaintiff

PRAYER: This Appeal Suit filed under Order 41 Rule 10 CPC against the

Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.9 of 2018 on the file of the District

Judge, Karur District, dated 17.11.2021.

For Appellant

: Mr. C.M. Arumugam

For Respondent

: Mr.K. Devaraj

JUDGMENT

Aggrieved over the decree and Judgment of the trial Court

decreeing the suit for a sum of Rs.8,50,000/-, the present appeal came to

1/17

AS(MD),No.202 of 2022

be filed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred herein

as per their ranking before the trial Court.

3. The brief facts of the case of the plaintiff is as follows:

The defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.8,50,000/- on

06.10.2016 for urgent family expenses from the plaintiff and executed a

pronote on the same day agreeing to pay interest at the rate of 0.05 paise

per hundred rupee per day. Despite repeated demands and requests made

by the plaintiff, the defen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top