HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Vijaya.G – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Commissioner – Respondent
WP(MD) 13937/2022
['M/s Kannan R R', '', '', 'SIVAKUMAR M', 'COUNTER FILED']
W.P.(MD)No.13937 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Writ Petition (MD) No.13937 of 2022
G.Vijaya
.. Petitioner
Versus
1.The Joint Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department,
Madurai.
2.The Executive Officer,
Arulmighu Kalyanasundareshwarar Kamatchiamman Thirukovil,
Melur,
Madurai District.
.. Respondents
Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to permit the
petitioner for obtaining electricity connection in Survey No.165/2, to an extent
of 0.73 Acres, 165/3, to an extent of 0.48 Acres, 181/2, to an extent of 0.30
Acres, 181/4b, to an extent of 0.24 cents and 185/10, to an extent of 0.27
Acres, situated at Melur, Madurai District, for the purpose of drawing the
water from deep well for cultivation and to set up the barbed wire fence on the
basis of the representation given by the petitioner, dated 28.03.2022.
For Petitioner
:
Mr.R.R.Kannan
For R1
:
Mr.M.Lingadurai
Special Government Pleader
For R2
:
Mr.S.Manohar
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.13937 of 2022
ORDER
The petitioner, who is the wife of Late.V.M.Gandhi, had sent a
representation to the second respondent on 29.03.2022 seeking permission to
dig a bore well and to obtain electricity service connection in the name of the
Temple.
2.The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the
petitioner's husband Late.V.M.Gandhi is the leaseholder of the following
Temple lands for more than 40 years.
Survey No.
Extent
Acres/Cent
165/2
0.73
165/3
0.48
181/2
0.30
181/4b
0.24
185/10
0.27
3.The petitioner's husband passed away on 14.11.2004 due to ill-health.
Thereafter, the petitioner and her son have been cultivating the lands for the
past 17 years and upto the Fasli year 1427, they have been regularly paying the
lease amount without any due. When the lands were given for lease, they were
classified as nanja lands. Thereafter, due to blockage of river water by putting
unauthorized constructions around the lands for the past 8 years, the flow of
the river water got obstructed and hence, agricultural activities could not be
2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.13937 of 2022
carried out as before. For betterment of agriculture, the primary source is the
water, hence, the petitioner needs to dig a borewell, for which, electricity
service connection is necessary.
4.In support of her claim, the petitioner had produced the receipt copies
available with her from the year 1984. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the second respondent Temple filed a proceeding before the
Special Deputy Collector, Revenue Court, Madurai, in P.T.No.40 of 2017,
seeking arrears of lease amount. The Revenue Court, by order dated
19.05.2017, had directed the petitioner's son namely, G.Pandiarajan to pay a
sum of Rs.1,92,762/- towards arrears of lease amount for the Fasli years 1402
to 1417 and 1421 to 1425. Thereafter, the petitioner's son had paid a sum of
Rs.1,38,067/- on 01.11.2019, after deducting the amount of Rs.55,579/-, which
was already paid, including the amount of Rs.884/-, which was payable
towards deficit quantity of paddy. Thus, the entire amount as on 19.05.2017
had been paid. The petitioner has also paid a sum of Rs.27,873/- for the Fasli
year 1427 on 26.10.2021. Thereafter, for the subsequent years, the amount
could not be paid due to Covid-19 situation and now, the petitioner is ready to
pay the balance due within a stipulated time.
3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.13937 of 2022
5.The learned counsel for the petitioner produced photographs showing
that the land is abutted with residential plots and draining out of sewage into
the land. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to
fe