SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
Samuthira Rani Eranest – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Cheif Secretary to Government – Respondent
HCP(MD)/1189/2021



HCP(MD). No.1189 of 2021

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

Monday, the Twenty Third day of August Two Thousand and Twenty One

PRESENT

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN

AND

The Hon'ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

HCP(MD). No.1189 of 2021

(in the matter of namely JULIET, FEMALE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

W/O.TRUMAN under Article 226 of the Constitution of India)

Samuthira rani Eranest

... Petitioner / Mother of Detenu

Vs

1.The Additional Cheif Secretary to Government,

Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,

Secretariat, Chennai - 9

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate,

Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.The Superintendent of Prison,

Special Prison for Women, Madurai.

... Respondents

To

1.The Additional Cheif Secretary to Government,

Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,

Secretariat, Chennai - 9

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate,

Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.The Superintendent of Prison,

Special Prison for Women, Madurai.

(With copies of petition and affidavit for each)

Through :

THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, CHENNAI - 600 104 FOR R1

THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, THOOTHUKUDI FOR R2

THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MADURAI FOR R3

(in duplicate, with copies for immediate service and return

with covering letter)

1/2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

HCP(MD). No.1189 of 2021

Whereas upon Motion this day made unto this Court by

Mr.A.JOSEPH JERRY, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.S.RAVI,

STANDING COUNSEL FOR THE STATE ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS and the

Advocate for the petitioner praying to detention order passed in

H.S.(M)Confdl.No.78/2021 dated 21.06.2021 on the file of the second

respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondents to

produce the detenu or body of the detenu namely JULIET, FEMALE, AGED

ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O.TRUMAN, now detained at the Special Jail for

Women, Madurai before the Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty

forthwith.

Whereas this Court hath directed issue of notice, returnable by

21/09/2021 to the respondents 1 to 3 herein to show cause why this

petition should not be complied with:

Now take notice that you, namely

1.The Additional Cheif Secretary to Government,

Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,

Secretariat, Chennai - 9

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate,

Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.The Superintendent of Prison,

Special Prison for Women, Madurai.

The respondents 1 to 3 herein are hereby directed to appear in

person or by an Advocate before the Madurai Bench of Madras High

Court, Madurai at 10.30 a.m on 21/09/2021 to show cause why this

petition should not be complied with.

HEREIN FAIL NOT,

WITNESS The Hon'ble Mr.Justice.SANJIB BANERJEE, The Chief

Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Madras on Monday, the

Twenty Third day of August Two Thousand and Twenty One.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (CS II)

ORDER DATED : 23/08/2021

HEARING DATE : 21/09/2021

==========================

NOTICE

==========================

HCP(MD). No.1189 of 2021

RS (27.08.2021) 2P 7C

2/2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top