C O M M O N O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 4 and the learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent.

2. The petitioner had taken the petition mentioned property on lease from the fifth respondent trust. The lease was regularly renewed and it was valid up to 31.03.2019. Thereafter, the fifth respondent refused to renew the lease. However, the petitioner is very much in possession of the property in question. Since the petitioner faced threat of dispossession from the lessor, the petitioner had filed O.S. No.69 of 2018 before the jurisdictional civil Court. The fifth respondent is also said to have given a complaint before the concerned authorities.

3. In the site in question, the petitioner was running a fire crackers shop. She was given LE5 license also. Following the complaint lodged by the lessor, the license came to be cancelled by the District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District on 30.07.2019. Challenging the same, the writ petitioner Annalakshmi filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Revenue Administration. The appeal was also dismissed on 02.11.2020. The order dis