HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Gajendran – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent
CRL OP(MD) 12264/2021
['M/s Sasidharan Tamilkani S T', '', 'Abinaya M', '', 'Public Prosecutor']
CRL OP(MD)No.12264 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
(Criminal Jurisdiction)
Date : 26.08.2021
PRESENT
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI
CRL OP(MD)No.12264 of 2021
GAJENDRAN
... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED
VS
THE STATE REP. BY,
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
THIRUVAIYARU POLICE STATION,
THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 1246/2020). ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : Mr.S.T.Sasidharam Tamilkani,
Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C
PRAYER :-
For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1246 of 2020 on the file
of the respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the
respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section
379 IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development &
Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.1246 of 2020, seeks anticipatory
bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and others
have illegally transported 1/4 unit of river sand in bullock carts.
Hence, the present case has been registered.
1/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
CRL OP(MD)No.12264 of 2021
3.Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is an innocent and has not committed any offence as
alleged by the prosecution. However, a false case has been foisted
as against him and therefore, prays for grant of anticipatory bail.
4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the
respondent police, on instructions, submits that the petitioner and
others have involved in illegal transportation of river sand. He
further submits that apart from this case, the petitioner is having
four previous cases to his credit. The details of such cases are as
follows:
i)Thiruvaiyaru Police Station, Cr.No.207 of 2021, u/s.379 IPC
r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act.
ii)Thiruvaiyaru Police Station, Cr.No.1242 of 2020, u/s.379 IPC
r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act.
iii)Thiruvaiyaru Police Station, Cr.No.1396 of 2020, u/s.379
IPC r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act.
iv)Thiruvaiyaru Police Station, Cr.No.1470 of 2020, u/s.379 IPC
r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the
nature of mineral transported and the antecedents of the petitioner,
this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands
dismissed.
6.It is needless to say that any tool or instrument or vehicle
used for illegal quarrying / transportation of sand is liable to be
seized under Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals(Development &
Regulation) Act, 1957 and any vehicle or instrument or tool which
has been seized under Section 21 (4) of the Mines and Minerals
(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, is liable to be confiscated
under Section 21(4-A) of the Act.
7.Though the above provision mandates the authorities to
confiscate the tool or instrument or vehicle involved in the
commission of the offence of illegal quarrying / transportation of
sand, the authorities have not invoked the provision under Section
21(4-A) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act,
1957 and therefore, a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.19936
of 2016, etc., batch has emphasized the need for confiscation of the
vehicles. Consequently, the Government has also issued certain
directions to the authorities of Revenue, Police and Forest and
Geology and Mining departments to seize the vehicles and for
confiscation of the same in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries (MMC-II)
Department, dated 05.08.2020. Therefore, the respondent police is
2/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/