SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
POTTAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
THANJAVUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(MD)/15157/2021



A municipality has the right to auction shops that are in its possession and that are not subject to a statutory tenancy.

Headnote:

AUCTION - TENDER - MUNICIPALITY - [KEYWORD] - The respondent, Thanjavur Municipal Corporation, had issued a tender notification to auction eight shops situated at Saraboji College Road, near New Bus Stand, Thanjavur. The petitioners, who were the licensees of the shops, challenged the notification, alleging that they had been in possession of the shops for a long time, that they had paid the license fees without default, and that the respondent had no right to terminate their licenses. The respondent contended that the petitioners had encroached upon additional area, had sublet the shops, and had defaulted in the payment of license fees. The respondent also alleged that the petitioners had produced forged and fabricated documents to support their claim of renewal of license. The Court held that the respondent had the right to auction the shops and that the petitioners had no right to question such step. The Court also held that the petitioners had come to Court with forged and fabricated documents and that they had abused the process of Court. The Court dismissed the petitions with costs.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were the licensees of eight shops situated at Saraboji College Road, near New Bus Stand, Thanjavur. The respondent, Thanjavur Municipal Corporation, issued a tender notification to auction the shops. The petitioners challenged the notification, alleging that they had been in possession of the shops for a long time, that they had paid the license fees without default, and that the respondent had no right to terminate their licenses. The respondent contended that the petitioners had encroached upon additional area, had sublet the shops, and had defaulted in the payment of license fees. The respondent also alleged that the petitioners had produced forged and fabricated documents to support their claim of renewal of license.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the respondent had the right to auction the shops and that the petitioners had no right to question such step. The Court also held that the petitioners had come to Court with forged and fabricated documents and that they had abused the process of Court.

Issues: 1. Whether the respondent had the right to auction the shops?2. Whether the petitioners had the right to question the auction?3. Whether the petitioners had produced forged and fabricated documents?4. Whether the petitioners had abused the process of Court?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the respondent had the right to auction the shops because the petitioners were only licensees and had no right to a statutory tenancy.2. The Court held that the petitioners had no right to question the auction because they had not been granted a license in their own names and had not applied to mutate the license in their names after the death of their respective husbands.3. The Court held that the petitioners had produced forged and fabricated documents because the respondent had lodged complaints with the District Crime Branch, who had registered First Information Reports against the petitioners.4. The Court held that the petitioners had abused the process of Court because they had come to Court with forged and fabricated documents and had also filed a suit in the District Munsif Court, Thanjavur, without impleading the respondent as a defendant in the suit.

Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petitions with costs.

W.P.(MD)No.15157 to 15160 and 18599 to 18602 of 2021

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

RESERVED ON : 16.12.2021

PRONOUNCED ON : 11.01.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

W.P.(MD)Nos.15157 to 15160 and 18599 to 18602 of 2021

and

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.12102, 12106, 12108, 12111, 15334, 15340, 15337,

15338, 17204, 17208, 17209, 17210, 17211, 17204, 17207, 17206 and

17205 of 2021

1.Pottammal

... Petitioner in WP(MD).15157 of 2021

2.I.Gnanakumari

... Petitioner in WP(MD).15158 of 2021

3. Mani

... Petitioner in WP(MD).15159 of 2021

4. Banumathy

... Petitioner in WP(MD).15160 of 2021

5. Pottammal

... Petitioner in WP(MD).18599 of 2021

6. Banumathy

... Petitioner in WP(MD).18600 of 2021

7. Mani

... Petitioner in WP(MD).18601 of 2021

8. I. Gnanakumari. ... Petitioner in WP(MD).18602 of 2021

vs.

Thanjavur Muncipal Corporation,

through its Commissioner, Thanjavur.

... Respondent

Prayer in WP(MD). 15157 to 15160 of 2021 : Writ Petition filed under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of

Certiorari,to call for the records relatin gto the tender

notification, dated 27.07.2021 in Na.Ka.No.7485/2015.M.C.A.5 of the

respondent Corporation published in Dailly Thanthi Newspaper on

17.08.2021 for auctioning the Shop No.1, situated at Saraboji

College Road, nearby New Bus Stand, Thanjavur, which is in

possession of the petitioner herein and quash the same as illegal.

Prayer in WP(MD). 18599 to 18602 of 2021 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of

Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in

the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to

the impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.7485/2015/MCA5, dated

01/10/2021 , issued by the respondent corporation and quash the same

as illegal and pass such further or other orders as this Honble

Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and

thus render justice

For Petitioner

:Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan

(in all WP's )

For Respondent

:Mr.N.Dilip Kumar

(in all WP's)

1/12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

W.P.(MD)No.15157 to 15160 and 18599 to 18602 of 2021

COMMON ORDER

W.P(MD)Nos.15157 and 18599 of 2021 have been filed by

Pottammal, both in the nature of Certiorari, respectively

questioning the tender notification dated 27.07.2021 of the

respondent bringing to auction, Shop No.1 at Saraboji College Road,

near New Bus Stand Thanjavur, and questioning the proceedings dated

01.10.2021 issued by the respondent cancelling the license of the

said shop granted to her late husband S. Sundaram.

2.W.P(MD)Nos.15158 and 18602 of 2021 have been filed by

I.Gnanakumari, both in the nature of Certiorari, respectively

questioning the tender notification dated 27.07.2021 of the

respondent bringing to auction, Shop No. 6 at Saraboji College Road,

near New Bus Stand Thanjavur, and questioning the proceedings dated

01.10.2021 issued by the respondent cancelling the license of the

said shop.

3.W.P(MD)Nos.15159 and 18601 of 2021 have been filed by Mani,

both in the nature of Certiorari, respectively questioning the

tender notification dated 27.07.2021 of the respondent bringing to

auction, Shop Nos. 4 & 5 at Saraboji College Road, near New Bus

Stand Thanjavur, and questioning the proceedings dated 01.10.2021

issued by the respondent cancelling the license of the said shops.

4.W.P(MD)Nos.15160 and 18600 of 2021 have been filed by

Banumathy both in the nature of Certiorari, respectively questioning

the tender notification dated 27.07.2021 of the respondent bringing

to auction, Shop Nos. 2 & 3 at Saraboji College Road, near New Bus

Stand Thanjavur, and questioning the proceedings dated 01.10.2021

issued by the respondent cancelling the license of the said shops

granted to her late husband Sekar.

4.In the affidavits

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top