SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
CSI Ayar Mandala Kaspa – Appellant
Versus
A.Stanly – Respondent
CRP(MD)/1396/2019



C.R.P.(MD)Nos.1396 & 1397 of 2019

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 06.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

C.R.P.(MD)Nos.1396 & 1397 of 2019

and

C.M.P.(MD) No.7442 of 2019

1.C.S.I. Ayar Mandala

Kaspa Sapai Arumanai, (CSI Home Church)

Rep by Secretary, Pallivilai,

Arumanai Post, Vellam Code Village,

Vilavan Code Taluk,

Kanyakumari District.

2.The Pastor,

CSI Home Church,

Pallivilai, Arumanai Post,

Vellam Code Village,

Vilavan Code Taluk,

Kanyakumari District.

... Petitioners in both CRPs.

-vs-

1.A.Stanly

2.Semon Aruldhas

3.S.Rajesh

... Respondents Nos.1 & 3

4.The Executive Officer,

Arunanai Town Panchayat,

Pallivilai, Arumanai Post,

Vellamcode Village,

Vilavancode Taluk,

Kanyakumari District.

5.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Padmanabhapuram,

Thuckalay Post, Kallulam Taluk,

Kanyakumari District.

6.The District Collector,

Kanyakumari District,

Nagercoil-62900.

... Respondents 4 to 6/Respondents 4 to 6

/Defendants 4 to 6

1/8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.R.P.(MD)Nos.1396 & 1397 of 2019

7.Jalaja

8.S.Mini

9.T.Kingsly

10.S.Vijaya

11.Sevaraj

12.Sundar Raj

13.Chandra

14.Sarasam

15.Lalitha.R

16.Packiaraj

17.J.David Raj

18.Vasantha

19.Sunitha.K

20.N.Saraswathy

21.Soman

22.J.Daisy

23.S.Radhakrishnan

24.A.Saleen

25.Bai

26.C.Murugan

27.Anusha

28.M.Ramesh

29.S.Saravana

30.J.Vijayalakshmi

31.P.Palus

32.Mary Pushpam

33.P.Anil kumar

34.Baby

35.Sunitha

36.S.Dhas

37.G.Usha

38.T.Christudhas

39.T.Sunitha kumari

40.Immanuvel

41.J.Sujatha

42.C.Isravel

43.S.Megala

44.P.Nagarajan

45.N.Johnson

46.T.Thangam

47.C.Painkili

48.M.Suresh

49.R.Sunil

50.Suppulakshmi

51.C.Vijayan

52.M.Leela

53.P.Muthupillai

54.Ponnesan

55.D.Esthakki

56.C.Leela

2/8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.R.P.(MD)Nos.1396 & 1397 of 2019

57.P.Vincent

58.A.Bai

59.S.Manikandan

60.S.Sivanesan

61.P.Rajendran

62.V.Santhi

63.Santha Bai

64.Saraswathy

65.Robinson

66.Kavitha

67.N.Bai

68.R.Pappa

69.V.Leema Rose

70.Ajitha

71.George

72.M.Selvan

73.Raju

74.R.Mohan Raj

75.N.Geetha

76.R.Raj kumar

77.P.Soumiya

78.R.Latha

79.D.Kurusumuthu

80.R.Raj

81.I.Suja

82.L.Anitha

83.S.Sivakumar

84.T.Ramesh

... Respondent 7 to 84/Proposed Party

85.The Bishop,

CSI Diocase,

Bishop House,

Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents/3rd Respondent/

3rd Defendent in both CRPs.

Prayer in CRP.(MD)No.1396 of 2019 :- Petition filed under Article

227 of the Constitution of India, to allow the Civil Revision

Petition and set aside the order and decreetal order in I.A.No.452

of 2017 in I.A.No.242 of 2017 in O.S.No.98 of 2016 on the file of

the First Additional District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai dated

27.02.2017.

Prayer in CRP.(MD)No.1397 of 2019 :- Petition filed under Article

227 of the Constitution of India, to allow the civil revision

petition and set aside the order and decreetal order in I.A.No.242

of 2017 in O.S.No.98 of 2016 on the file of the First Additional

District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai dated 07.10.2017.

3/8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.R.P.(MD)Nos.1396 & 1397 of 2019

For Petitioners

: Mr.V.M.Balamohan Thambi

For R1

: Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh

For R4

: Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah

COMMON ORDER

The above civil revision petitions emanate from the proceedings

in IA No.452 of 2017 (CRP(MD) No.1396 of 2019) and IA No.242 of 2017

(CRP(MD) No.1397 of 2019) in OS No.98 of 2016.

2.The brief facts are as follows:-

(i) The suit O.S.No.98 of 2016 was filed by the respondents 1

to 3 herein against the petitioners herein as well as the

respondents 4 to 6 for an injunction restraining the revision

petitioner herein from using the suit property as a burial ground

and the respondents 4 to 6 from granting permission to use the

property to till the disposal of the above suit.

(ii) The case of the respondents 1 to 3 was that the suit

schedule property belongs to the first petitioner. The housing plots

belong

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top