SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Mohandoss – Appellant
Versus
G. Dakshayani – Respondent
CMP(MD) 6932/2022



Advocates:
['M/S S MUNIYANDI', '', 'J JEYA ARON RAJA', 'V RAMALINGAM']

CMA.(MD)No.SR45726 of 2022

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 08.08.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

AND

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

CMP(MD) No.6932 of 2022 in

CMA.(MD)No.SR45726 of 2022

S.Mohandoss

: Petitioner

Vs.

G.Dakshayani

: Respondent

PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to

condone the delay of 4142 days in filing CMA(MD) No.SR45726 of

2022.

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of the

Family Courts Act against the order dated 28.02.2011 made in

HMOP(MD) No.397 of 2010 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai.

For Petitioner

: Mr.S.Muniyandi

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMA.(MD)No.SR45726 of 2022

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.)

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 4142 days in

filing the CMA(MD) No.SR45726 of 2022 against the order dated

28.02.2011 in HMOP No.397/2010 on the file of the Family Court,

Madurai.

2.In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the petitioner has

not given proper/valid reasons for condoning the delay of nearly 12

years. It is stated that the respondent did not contract second marriage

and living with her parents without any income. It is further stated that

the petitioner is taking steps for his younger son's marriage and that on

account of the decree of divorce, the petitioner is not able to get a bride

for his son. Absolutely, no valid explanation has been given for the delay

of nearly 12 years in the affidavit. The petitioner's only contention is that

his Doctor advised him to take rest, which cannot be a valid reason for

condoning the delay of 12 years. Hence, for want of bona fide and

proper reasons, this petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMA.(MD)No.SR45726 of 2022

petition to condone the delay of 4142 days is dismissed. Consequently,

the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands rejected. No costs.

[S.S.S.R, J.] & [S.S.Y, J.]

08.08.2022

Internet

: Yes

RR

To

The Family Court,

Madurai.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMA.(MD)No.SR45726 of 2022

S.S.SUNDAR. J

AND

S.SRIMATHY, J

RR

Order made in

CMP(MD) No.6932 of 2022 in

CMA.(MD)No.SR45726 of 2022

08.08.2022

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top