W.P. (MD). No.17776 of 2019

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 24.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

W.P. (MD). No.17776 of 2019

Rajalakshmi

W/o.Sudhakar

... Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The Director General of Police,

Office of the Director General of Police,

Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,

Chennai.

2.The Inspector General of Police,

Central Zone,

Office of the Inspector General of Police,

Trichy.

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police,

Office of the Deputy Inspector General of Police,

Trichy -620 023.

4.The Superintendent of Police,

Office of the Superintendent of Police,

Trichy District.

5.The Inspector of Police,

Navalpattu Police Station,

Trichy District.

6.Suresh Kumar,

The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Trichy District.

... Respondents

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the

respondents 1 to 4 to take action against the respondents 5 and 6

for to harass petitioner and her family members by considering the

petitioner representation dated 06.08.2019, in accordance with law

within the stipulated time.

For Petitioner

: Mr.R.Alagumani

For Respondents

: Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar

Additional Public Prosecutor

1/3

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

W.P. (MD). No.17776 of 2019

O R D E R

The writ petition is filed by way of notorious accused alleging

that the respondent police is harassing the petitioner during night

hours under the guise of enquiry.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the

respondent police submitted that the allegations are imaginary and

false and in order to prevent the police from discharging their

exercise, the present writ petition is filed making personal

allegation against the officials, who want to take action against

the petitioner and her husband, who is involved in four murder cases

and few other grave offences.

3. The representation of the petitioner dated 06.08.2019,

attributes motive against the sixth respondent as if an attempt has

been made to file a false case against her husband. The 6^th

respondent has visited her house on 04.08.2019 for searching her

husband and informed her to inform the police as soon as, whenever

her husband came to home. However, the same is denied by the police

and it is stated that no such occurrence took place, which is now

being used as a weapon for the violators of law to make false

allegation against the police, as if their rights have been

violated, even if they discharge their duty in order to maintain the

law and order.

4. Going by the records and the submission made by the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor, there is no serious misconduct on the

part of the concerned respondent, even if the petitioner is correct,

the 6^th respondent went to her house only to search of her husband

and he asked the petitioner herein to inform whereabouts of her

husband. This cannot be termed as violation of right, which requires

action against higher officials. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is

dismissed. No Costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

// True Copy //

/ /2022

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

tta

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19

pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for

official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order

that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the

responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

2/3

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

W.P. (MD). No.17776 of 2019

To

1.The Director General of Police,

Office of the Director General of Police,

Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,

Chennai.

2.The Inspector General of Police,

Central Zone,

Office of the Inspector General of Police,

Trichy.

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police,

Office