HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Jambai Hardware Stores – Appellant
Versus
Prakash A.Khanna – Respondent
CRL RC(MD) 781/2022
['M/s Mohideen Basha N', '', '', 'Arvind Pawlraj J M', 'Mohamed Hashim A']
CRL.R.C.(MD).No.781 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Reserved on : 25.08.2022
Pronounced on : 02.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
CRL.R.C.(MD).No.781 of 2022
and
CRL.M.P.(MD).No.9709 of 2022
1.M/s.Jambai Hardware Stores,
Rep. by its Managing Partner,
S.Mohamed Yahiya,
Tanjore Main Road,
Thiruverumbur, Trichy-13.
2.S.Md.Yahiya
3.S.Hassan Ali
4.Y.Shakila Banu
: Petitioners/Petitioners/Appellant
Vs.
Prakash A.Khanna
: Respondent/Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 and 401 of
Cr.P.C, to call for the records in Cr.M.P.No.2 of 2021 in Crl.A.No.1 of 2020,
dated 05.04.2022 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge,
Tiruchirappalli and revise the same.
1/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.R.C.(MD).No.781 of 2022
For Petitioners
: Mr.N.Mohideen Basha
ORDER
The Criminal Revision Petition is directed against the order passed in
Cr.M.P.No.2 of 2021 in Crl.A.No.1 of 2020, dated 05.04.2022 on the file of the
learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli, dismissing the
petition filed under Section 293 of Cr.P.C.
2.The petitioners are the appellants in Crl.A.No.1 of 2020 on the file of the
learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli and accused in
S.T.C.No.201 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV,
Tiruchirappalli.
3.The respondent is the complainant and he filed a private complaint under
Section 200 Cr.P.C., against the petitioners for the alleged offence under Section
138 of N.I. Act.
3.The learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Trichy, after conducting trial, has
passed a judgment, dated 25.11.2019, convicting the petitioners/accused for the
offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act and sentenced the first accused firm to pay
a fine of Rs.5,000/- and sentenced the accused 2 to 4 to undergo six months
Simple Imprisonment each and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each, in default to
2/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.R.C.(MD).No.781 of 2022
undergo one month Simple Imprisonment. Challenging the said Judgment of
conviction and sentence, the accused have preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.1 of
2020 and the same is pending on the file of the learned Principal District and
Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli.
4.Pending appeal, the petitioners/accused have filed a petition in
Cr.M.P.No.2 of 2021 under Section 293 of Cr.P.C. seeking orders for forwarding
the documents exhibited as Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.8 to the Nutron Activation Analysis
Chemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai for
examining the age of the ink used in the signatures found in Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.8
compared with the contents filled up in those documents and for sending of the
report.
5.The respondent/complainant has filed a counter statement raising serious
objections for granting the relief claimed by the petitioners/accused.
6.The learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, after enquiry in the
above petition in Cr.M.P.No.2 of 2021, has passed the impugned order,
dismissing the same. Aggrieved by the said order of dismissal, the
petitioners/accused have come forward with the present criminal revision.
3/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.R.C.(MD).No.781 of 2022
7.The case of the complainant is that the accused have approached the
complainant for financial help and received Rs.30,00,000/- on 10.10.2005 from
the complainant, that after executing promissory notes, the accused were paying
interest to the complainant for some time, that after expiry of two years period,
since interest were not paid, the complainant insisted for the return of the loan
amount along with interest, that the accused have issued cheques in favour of the
complainant in order to repay the amounts due, that three cheques were issued by
the second accused duly signed by him in the name of the f