HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Palaniappan – Appellant
Versus
Prabhakaran – Respondent
CRP(MD) 1695/2022
['M/s R Niresh Kumar', '', 'P Samuel Gunasingh', 'DINDIGUL']
C.R.P(MD)No.1695 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 22.08.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
C.R.P(MD)No.1695 of 2022
Palaniappan
... Petitioner
Vs
1.Prabhakaran
Administrative Head of
Komugi Vivasaya Sangam,
D.No.10/39, 6th Cross Street,
Spencer Compound,
Near Bus Stand,
Dindigul Town.
2.Komugi Vivasaya Sangam,
Rep through its Administrative Head,
Prabhakaran, S/o, Chinniah,
D.No.10/39, 6th Cross Street,
Spencer Compound,
Near Bus Stand,
Dindigul Town
... Respondents
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.1695 of 2022
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, to direct the learned Principal District Munsif,
Dindigul to dispose of RLTOP No.4 of 2022, within the time framed by
this Court.
For Petitioner
: Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh
O R D E R
This petition has been filed to direct the learned Principal
District Munsif, Dindigul to dispose of RLTOP No.4 of 2022, within the
time frame fixed by this Court.
2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a landlord
and the respondents are the tenants through oral contract on 03.04.2021
and fixed a sum of Rs.15,000/- as monthly rent. Since the respondents
failed to pay the rent promptly, the petitioner filed R.L.T.O.P.No.4 of
2022 as against the respondents, under Section 21 (1) and (2.A) of the
Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.1695 of 2022
Tenants Act, 2017, before the Rent Control Court/Principal District
Munsif Court, Dindigul.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that R.L.T.O.P.No.4 of 2021 was filed on 03.07.2021 and the same has to
be decided within a period of 90 days of filing of the application, as per
Section 34 (6) (a) of the said Act. The grievance of the petitioner is that
the application filed by the petitioner is still kept pending without any
progress. Therefore, the petitioner has come up with this present Civil
Revision Petition for early disposal of R.L.T.O.P.No.4 of 2022.
4.This Court considered the submissions of the learned
counsel for the petitioner and also perused the materials placed on
record. Since no adverse order is going to be passed as against the
respondent, notice to them is dispensed with.
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.1695 of 2022
5.Admittedly, the petitioner is a landlord and the respondents
are the tenants. Since the respondents are not prompt in payment of rent
to the petitioner, he filed R.L.T.O.P.No.4 of 2022 as against the
respondents, under Section 21 (1) and (2.A) of the Tamil Nadu
Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act,
2017, before the Rent Control Court/Principal District Munsif Court,
Dindigul.
6.As per Section 34 (6) (a), the application has to be decided
within a period of 90 days from the date of filing of the application. For
better appreciation, the above Section is extracted as under:-
Section 34: Jurisdication of Rent Court;-
(6)(a) All applications under clauses (a), (b), (c), (e),(f) and
(h) of sub section (2) of Section 21 shall be decided within
90 days of filing of application to the Rent Court;
4/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.1695 of 2022
7. Considering the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner
in this Civil Revision Petition and also taking into consideration the
provisions under the Act, there shall be a direction to the learned
Principal District Munsif, Dindigul to dispose of R.L.T.O.P No.4 of
2022, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of
this order. No costs.
22.08.2022
vrn
To
The Principal District Munsif, Dindigul
5/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.1695 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
vrn
C.R.P(MD)No.1695 of 2022
22.08.2022
6/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis