HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HASHIDHAHANI – Appellant
Versus
MUBARAK – Respondent
CMP(MD) 9070/2021
CMP(MD) No.9070 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Second day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.N.MANJULA
CMP(MD) No.9070 of 2021
in
AS(MD) No.269 of 2021
HASHIDHAHANI ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT
Vs
1 MUBARRAK
2 RAHMATH NISHA
3 JAGUBAR ALI
4 ALEXANDER
(SINCE THE RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 SET-EXPARTE
BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT. HENCE NOTICE TO
THE RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 MAY BE DISPENSED
WITH) ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated
therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be
pleased to grant an order of interim injunction restraining the
respondents from alienating or encumbering suit schedule property
pending disposal of the above first appeal.
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY
GJf;Nfhl;il khtl;lk; & jhYfh GJf;Nfhl;il hpb & rg;b GJf;Nfhl;il lTz;
efuhl;rp vy;iyf;Fs; gl;lJk; kd;dh; fy;Yhhp tpisahl;L ikjhdj;Jf;Fk; nry;yd; tifawh
GQ;ir epyj;Jf;Fk; fpof;Frhkp ma;ahh; Fsj;J cs;sha;f;Fk; nyit rhaG GQ;ir
epyj;Jf;Fk; tlf;F gq;fhU mk;khs; gl;lh GQ;ir epyj;Jf;Fk; Nkw;F Mde;jhghf; Njhg;G
epyj;Jf;Fk; njw;F ,e;j ngUehd;nfy;iyf;Fl;gl;lJkhd Mh;.v];.233/2> 233/3 ghh;l; 238/b>
238/,> 238/[p> 238/nfr; GQ;irepyq;fspy; rptfq;iflTd; gpshdpq; bg;biluhf;lh;
mth;fSila ne 985/71 Mh;.v];.3/24.04.71 Njjpa cj;jputpd; gb mq;fPfhuk; nra;ag;gl;lJk;
GJf;Nfhl;ilKdprpgy; fkprdh; mth;fshy; 25.06.71 NjjpAs;s Mh;.rp.3243/71 vg;.1 cj;jputpd;
mDkjp nra;ag;gl;lJkhd Ny mTl;by; fz;lJk; 65 ne kidaplj;Jf;Fk; tlf;Ffponky;
Nuhl;Lf;Fnjw;F 51 eph; kidaplj;Jf;Fk; fpof;F 53 eph; kidaplj;Jf;Fk; Nkw;F ,jw;Fs;gl;l
52 eph; kidaplk; fpoNky; [hjpab 40 njd;tly; [hjpab 70 cs;sJk; Nkw;gbkidaplj;jpy;
fl;lg;gl;bUf;fpwjhh;RtPL mijr; Nrh;e;j Gof;f ];jyk; fpzh; ff;$]; Nkw;gb tPl;by; gpl;bq;];
nra;jpUf;Fk; vyf;l;hpf; iyl; gpl;bq;]; & fidf;rd; efuhl;rpFbjz;zPh; Foha; fidf;rd;
cs;glTk;. Nkw;gb tPl;ilr; Nrh;e;j rfyghj;jpaq;fs; cs;glTk; gioathh;L vz;.22
Gjpathh;L vz;.33 thptpjpg;G vz;.33342 kpd; ,izg;Gvz;fs; 111-004-612 111-004-306 gpshl;
vz;.52 Fbjz;zPh; Foha; ,izg;G vz;.33124 ,J GJf;Nfhl;il lTz; rh;Nt 8474
fpuhkrh;Nt vz;.233/f;F cl;gl;lJ gpshf; eph; 71 efuhl;rp thp urPJg;gb tPl;L ek;gh; 8473/7577.
Nkw;gb tPl;bd; kidaplj;jpd; gug;gsT 2800 rJub cs;sJ.
1/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
CMP(MD) No.9070 of 2021
PRAYER IN AS(MD) No.269 of 2021:
To set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 21.04.2021 made in
O.S.No.43 of 2014 on the file of the Additional District Judge,
Pudukottai.
ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon
perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and
upon hearing the arguments of M/S.J.ANANDKUMAR, Advocate for the
petitioner and of M/S.S.PRABHA, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent
Nos.1 & 2, the court made the following order:-
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking interim
injunction, restraining the respondents from alienating or
encumbering the suit property pending disposal of appeal suit.
2.The suit has been filed for the reliefs of declaration and
recovery of possession along with damages for future prospects. The
suit was dismissed by the trial Court. Hence, the plaintiff has
preferred the Appeal Suit. Pending Appeal, the appellant/plaintiff
has filed this petition, restraining the respondents from
alienating the suit property. If the respondents encumber or
alienates the suit property that will create third parties interest
and create multiplicity of proceedings.
3.Hence, it is appropriate for the petitioner/appellant to seek
the relief of temporary injunction to restrain the respondents from
alienating the suit property, during the pendency