SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT - MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
SURESH – Appellant
Versus
VINOTHA @ NANTHINI – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S D ANBARASU', '', 'M KANNAN', 'V SARAVANA GANDHI', 'TRICHY']

C.R.P PD(MD)Nos.1769 & 1770 of 2022

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

Dated: 01.09.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

C.R.P(MD)Nos.1769 & 1770 of 2022

Suresh

... Petitioner in both CRPs

Vs

Vinotha @ Nanthini

... Respondent in both CRPs

COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227

of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Subordinate Judge,

Thuraiyur to expedite the trial in H.M.O.P.No.49 of 2020 & H.M.O.P.No.

81 of 2020, within a time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner

: Mr.D.Anbarasu

(In both CRPs)

C O M M O N O R D E R

These Civil Revision Petitions are filed to direct the learned

Subordinate Judge, Thuraiyur to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.49 of 2020 &

H.M.O.P.No.81 of 2020, within a time stipulated by this Court.

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P PD(MD)Nos.1769 & 1770 of 2022

2.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner in both Civil Revision Petitions is the husband and the

respondent is the wife. The marriage between the petitioner and the

respondent was solemnized on 20.01.2016. Thereafter, due to some

misunderstanding, they are living separately. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top