HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
SEETHAIAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(MD)/19301/2021
W.P(MD)No.19301 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P(MD).No.19301 of 2021
Seethaiammal
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
3.The Superintending Engineer,
TANGEDCO, Tuticorin.
...Respondents
(*R3 is suo motu impleaded vide
Order dated 13.12.2021)
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus,
directing the respondents to determine the compensation to be given
to the petitioner for the loss of the petitioner's land by the
construction of High Tension Electricity Tower and Drawing of
Electric line by the TANGEDCO through the lands of the petitioner in
S.No.65/4A and 65/4B comprised in Patta No.3242, Ottapidaram Village
and Taluk, Tuticorin District in considering the representation of
the petitioner, dated 08.09.2020.
For Petitioner
: Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai
For Respondents
: Mr.J.John Rajadurai
Government Advocate
ORDER
The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of Mandamus,
seeking a direction to the respondents particularly to the first
respondent/the District Collector, Thoothukudi, to determine the
compensation to be given to the petitioner for the loss of land
owing to construction of High Tension Electricity Tower and drawing
of electric line by TANGEDCO through the lands of the petitioner in
S.Nos.65/4A and 65/4B in patta No.3242, Ottapidaram Village,
Tuticorin District.
1/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P(MD)No.19301 of 2021
2.In the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, it
had been stated that the petitioner is the owner of the
aforementioned lands and she has also the benefit of grant of patta.
It is alleged that the Superintendent Engineer, TANGEDCO,
Tuticorin/third respondent had constructed a High Tension Electric
Post in the patta land of the petitioner. Further they had drawn
High Tension Electric Lines at a height of 100 feet over the said
lands. The Writ Petitioner seeks compensation for such construction
of the High Tension Electric Post in her patta lands.
3.Heard Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, learned Counsel who appears for
the petitioner, Mr.J.John Rajadurai, learned Government Advocate who
appears for the respondents.
4.The issue of compensation, has to be examined only by the
District Collector under Sections 15 and 16 of the Telegraph Act,
1885. It is seen that in exercise of the powers under Section 10 of
the Electricity Act, 2003 and also the powers conferred under
Section 51 of the Electricity Act, 2003, such High Tension
Electricity Tower have been constructed. Now, the onus is on the
District Collector to examine the compensation to be paid. Section
16 of the Telegraphic Act, 1885, provides for that particular
purpose.
5.A direction is therefore given to the District Collector to
issue notice to the petitioner and also to the third respondent/the
Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, to examine the case of the
petitioner, to examine the place at which the High Tension
Electicity Post has been errected, examine whether the same has been
put up in the patta lands of the petitioner and thereafter, give due
opportunity to both the parties and then determine whether
compensation is payable to the petitioner. If compensation is
payable to the petitioner, the entire exercise may be completed
within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy
of this order.
6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed
of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Writs)
// True Copy //
/ /2022
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
lr
2/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P(MD)No.19301 of 2021
Note : In view of the present lock