HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANTONY XAVIER RAJA – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
CRL A(MD)/380/2015
Crl.A.(MD) No. 380 of 2015
Bail Slip
The Appellant / Sole Accused viz., Antony Xavier Raja was
directed to be released on Bail by the order of this Court dated
08/02/2016 and Made in MP.1 of 2015 in Crl.A 380 of 2015.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
JUDGMENT RESERVED ON
: 05.07.2021
JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON
: 29.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Crl.A.(MD) No. 380 of 2015
Antony Xavier Raja
S/o.Siluvai Mariyan
: Appellant/Sole Accused
-vs-
State through
The Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Tiruchendur,
Thoothukudi District.
(Crime No.6 of 2011)
: Respondent / Complainant
PRAYER:- Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, to set aside the conviction and sentence passed
against the appellant by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir
Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi, in Sessions
Case No.148 of 2015, dated 11.12.2015 and acquit the
Appellant/Accused.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Saravanan
For Respondent
: Mr.T.Senthil Kumar
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and
Conviction dated 11.12.2015 by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast
Track Mahila Court, Thoothukudi in S.C.No.148 of 2015.
2. The facts, which are relevant for consideration in this
appeal, as per the prosecution case, are briefly as follows:
2.1. The prosecutrix and the accused are related to each other.
The accused used to visit the house of the prosecutrix often and
used to talk with her. On 19.07.2005 by around 11.00 a.m., when the
prosecutrix was alone in the house, the accused came to the house of
the prosecutrix and forcibly had intercourse with her. When the
prosecutrix scolded him, he consoled her saying that he will marry
her and he promised to marry her in the name of god. Also he had
1/8
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Crl.A.(MD) No. 380 of 2015
requested her not to disclose it to any one. Again on 27.07.2005 by
around 11.00 a.m., when the prosecutrix was alone in the house, the
accused came and forcibly took her to the field nearby and in the
guise of promise to marry her, had intercourse with her.
Thereafter, the accused had intercourse with the prosecutrix several
times. On 17.09.2005 by around 6.00 p.m., when the accused was
standing near the water tank, the prosecutrix approached him and
requested him to marry her, as he had raped her. The accused
refused to marry her. On 23.04.2006 the prosecutrix delivered a
male child in Christopher Hospital, Thisaiyanvilai. On 13.05.2011
by around 4.00 p.m. when the accused was sitting in front of St.
Antony's Church, the prosecutrix approached him and questioned him,
how he is making arrangement to marry another girl after cheating
the prosecutrix and her child. To this, the accused scolded her
and abused her in filthy language stating that he is not the father
of the child. Therefore, the prosecutrix approached All Women
Police Station, Tiruchendur and lodged a complaint under Ex.P-1.
Based on the complaint of the prosecutrix under Ex.P-1, P.W-12-Sub
Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, had registered an FIR
under Ex.P-9 and sent the same to the Court of the learned Judicial
Magistrate, Sathankulam. P.W-12 placed the copy of the same to the
higher officials of police department. P.W-13-Rajamani, Inspector
of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruchendur had taken up the
investigation of the case registered in Crime No.6 of 2011 of All
Women Police Station, Tiruchendur under Sections 417, 294(b) of IPC
and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harassment to Women
Act. He had examined the witnesses. Already, P.W-12-Rajakumari had
commenced the investigation, she had arrested the accused and
forwarded him to remand with remand request to the Court of the
learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam.