HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
SATHEESHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE – Respondent
WP(MD)/20372/2019
W.P.(MD)No.20372 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 24.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
W.P.(MD)No.20372 of 2019
Satheeshkumar, S/o.Chandiraraj
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Theni District, Theni.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Palanichettipatti Police Station,
Theni District.
3.Yazhisaiselvan,
Sub-Inspector of Police,
Palanichettipatti Police Station,
Theni District.
4.Dharmar,
Special Sub-Inspector of Police,
Palanichettipatti Police Station,
Theni District.
5.Thankapandi,
Head Constable No.979,
Palanichettipatti Police Station,
Theni District.
6.Thangapandian @ Ponthangapandian
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the
first respondent to conduct the enquiry upon the petitioner's
complaint dated 06.09.2019 and on that basis to take necessary
action against the respondents 3 to 5 and hand over the car bearing
Registration No.TN-12-J-7242 to the petitioner forthwith.
For Petitioner
: Mr.V.Thirumal
For R1 to R5
: Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar
Additional Public Prosecutor
For R6
: Mr.R.Maheswaran
1/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P.(MD)No.20372 of 2019
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed seeking Mandamus to direct the
first respondent to conduct enquiry upon the complaint dated
06.09.2019, given by the petitioner herein. The said complaint of
the petitioner states that during the month of January 2018, he
purchased a second-hand car, bearing Registration No.TN-12-J-7242
from the sixth respondent through broker for a sale consideration of
Rs.5,50,000/-, for which, he paid initial amount of Rs.3,50,000/-
and took possession of the car with the specific understanding that
he
will
pay
the
balance
sale
consideration
of
Rs.2,00,000/- after handing over the R.C. Book and name transfer
clearance. However, the sixth respondent did not hand over the R.C.
Book and delayed the same. Therefore, on 04.08.2019, he gave a
complaint to the respondent Police to take action against the sixth
respondent for not arranging the transfer of the vehicle in his name
after receiving the balance of Rs.2,00,000/-. The said complaint
was enquired and the sixth respondent agreed to pay Rs.2,50,000/-
and get back the car. Accordingly, the car was handed over to the
sixth respondent and the sixth respondent gave a cheque for
Rs.2,50,000/-, dated 01.09.2019. It was agreed by the sixth
respondent that the cheque is given as security and he will pay the
cash and get back the cheque. However, he did not pay the cash
Rs.2,50,000/- in spite of handing over the car to him. Alleging
that the sixth respondent's modus operandi is to cheat the public in
the manner stated above and there are several complaints against him
and in spite of the complaint dated 06.09.2019, the Police has not
acted upon his complaint, the present Writ Petition is filed.
2.The sixth respondent, who has entered appearance through
counsel, has filed counter affidavit stating that he is a trader of
used cars and the subject car Tavera bearing Registration No.TN-12-
J-7242 was sold to one Muthuraj for a sale consideration of
Rs.5,50,000/-. As per the agreement dated 09.05.2019, entered into
between the Muthuraj and the sixth respondent, a sum of
Rs.2,50,000/- was paid to the sixth respondent and the possession of
the vehicle was handed over to Muthuraj. The copy of the R.C. Book,
Permit and Insurance were handed over to Muthuraj along with the
vehicle. The said Muthuraj did not turn up to pay the balance
amount. When he was called by the second respondent Police based on
the complaint given by the petitioner, dated 04.08.2019, he came to
know that the vehicle is in the possession of the pe