SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
R.SRINIVASAN – Appellant
Versus
PALANIMUTHU – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal is filed to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned I Additional District Judge (PCR), Tiruchirappall in Criminal Appeal No.22 of 2014, dated 31.10.2014.

2.The brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of this criminal appeal are as follows:

2.1.The appellant is the complainant before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Tiruchirappalli. As per the complaint, the accused before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, is alleged to have obtained loan of Rs.3,00,000/- from the complainant on 12.03.2006 for which he had issued a cheque on 04.09.2006. When the same was presented by the complainant on the same day, it was returned for insufficient funds on 05.09.2006. Therefore, he had sent statutory notice on 13.09.2006 calling upon the accused to settle the dues within fifteen days, failing which, he will be forced to take legal action through Court of law. The accused received the notice on 16.09.2006 and he had issued reply on

04.10.2006 whereby he claimed that he had not executed any promissory note or cheque in favour of the complainant. As per his claim in the reply notice, he had already borrowed a sum of Rs.20,000/- from o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top