SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.ILANGOVAN
K.Veeramani – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector – Respondent
CRL OP(MD)/20196/2021



Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20196 of 2021

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 17.12.2021

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20196 of 2021

1.K.Veeramani

2.K.Selvam @ Selvakumar

3.Karuppaiah

... Petitioners/Petitioners

Vs.

State rep by

The Inspector of Police,

Gandarvakottai Police Station,

Pudukkottai District.

(Crime No.631 of 2021.)

... Respondent/Respondent

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 r/w 439

(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to modify the condition

imposed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge,

Pudukkottai in Cr.M.P.No.4140 of 2021, dated 20.10.2021 as the

petitioner to report before the Judicial Magistrate, Gandarvakottai

or respondent police instead of to appear before the Judicial

Magistrate No.I, Karur, daily twice at 10.30 a.m and 05.00 p.m.

For Petitioners

: Mr.N.Jothivel

For Respondent

: Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking modification of the order that

has been passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions

Judge, Pudukkottai, in Cr.M.P.No.4140 of 2021, dated 20.10.2021.

2. The petitioners have moved anticipatory bail application

before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge,

Pudukkottai, and that petition was allowed by imposing conditions

upon the petitioners that they should appear before the Judicial

Magistrate No.I, Karur, daily twice at 10.30 a.m and 05.00 p.m until

further orders and insofar as relaxation & modification of condition

is concerned, the petitioners should approach the learned Judicial

Magistrate, Gandarvakkottai.

3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, when

they have approached the learned Judicial Magistrate,

Gandarvakkottai, since the order of anticipatory bail was passed by

the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai, they

were directed to approach the District Court.

1/2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20196 of 2021

4.It appears that the grievance expressed by the learned

counsel for the petitioners is genuine one. So, that portion of the

order directing the petitioners to approach before the learned

Judicial Magistrate, Gandarvakkottai, in case of relaxation and

modification is set aside and the petition is allowed. In case of

relaxation and modification, he can approach only the learned

Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai. The other

conditions shall remain unaltered.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

// True Copy //

/ /2021

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

dss

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19

pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for

official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order

that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the

responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge,

Pudukkottai.

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.I,

Karur.

3.The Judicial Magistrate,

Gandarvakkottai.

4.The Inspector of Police,

Gandarvakottai Police Station,

Pudukkottai District.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor,

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20196 of 2021

17.12.2021

PS(CO)

GC(27.12.2021) 2P 6C

2/2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top