SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sri Pattinam Kathar @ Satha Ayyanar Temple – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(MD) 20558/2021



Advocates:
['M/S NAVANEETHARAJA K', '', 'azhageson a', '']

1 W.P.(MD)NO.20558 OF 2021

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 04.08.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

W.P.(MD)No.20558 of 2021

Sri Pattinam Kathar @ Satha Ayyanar temple,

Rep. by its Vice President (President In-charge),

S.S.Vadivel.

(Amended vide Order dated 04.08.2022 in

W.M.P.(MD)No.17977 of 2021)

... Petitioner

Vs.

1. The District Collector,

Ramanathapuram District,

Ramanathapuram.

2. The Tahsildar,

Kadaladi,

Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Taluk Surveyor,

Kadaladi Taluk,

Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing

the third respondent to conduct survey and measurement in

respect of the petitioner's temple land in S.No.128/2,

Vaalinokkam Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram

District, within a time frame that may be fixed by this court.

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2 W.P.(MD)NO.20558 OF 2021

For Petitioner

: Mr.K.Navaneetharaja

For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash,

Additional Government Pleader.

* * *

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ

petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader

appearing for the respondents.

2. The only prayer made in the writ petition is that

the petition mentioned temple land must be surveyed and

boundary must be demarcated.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the

learned Additional Government Pleader raised twofold

objections. According to him, the property is a sarkar

poramboke and it cannot be surveyed at the instance of the

private party. He would also state that the assignment was

made in the very same survey number and that there has been

sub-divisioning also.

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3 W.P.(MD)NO.20558 OF 2021

4. I went through the contents of ' A ' register extract.

It categorically mentions in column 12 in Survey No.128/2 in

Vaalinokkam, there is a well and Sathappan temple. From this,

one can safely infer that the petition mentioned land belongs

to the temple. Therefore, the second respondent is directed to

conduct survey and demarcate the boundary within a period of

eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If

however, any house had been come up in the petition

mentioned survey number, the same will be excluded while

demarcating the boundaries. This writ petition stands allowed.

No costs.

04.08.2022

Index

: Yes / No

Internet : Yes/ No

PMU

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4 W.P.(MD)NO.20558 OF 2021

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

PMU

To:

1. The District Collector,

Ramanathapuram District,

Ramanathapuram.

2. The Tahsildar,

Kadaladi,

Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Taluk Surveyor,

Kadaladi Taluk,

Ramanathapuram District.

W.P.(MD)No.20558 of 2021

04.08.2022

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top