SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice C. SARAVANAN
T.MANICKAVEL, – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER, – Respondent


W.P.(MD).No.13607 of 2018

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 14.03.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

W.P.(MD).No.13607 of 2018

and

W.M.P.(MD).No.12387 of 2018

T.Manickavel

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Commissioner,

HR&CE Department,

Uthamar Gandhi Salai,

Chennai-34.

2.The Executive Officer,

Arulmighu Nateswarar Thirukovil (AKA)

Arulmighu Natarajar Thirukovil,

Nilakkottai,

Dindigul District.

...Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified

Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent in his

letter dated 07.06.2018 and quash the same and further direct the

respondents to attorn the ground lease of Shop No.12-5-16, Main

Bazaar, Nilakkottai in the name of the petitioner.

For Petitioner

: Mr.T.S.R.Venkataramana

For R1

: Mr.P.Subbaraj

Special Government Pleader

For R2

: Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian

ORDER

I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel

for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for

the first respondent and the learned counsel for the second

responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top