HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
BALA MURUGAN – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
CRL A(MD) 317 2018
Crl.A.(MD).No.317 of 2018
Bail Slip
The Appellant Accused Bala Murugan was directed to be released
on Bail as per order of this Court dated 01/08/2018 in Crl.MP(MD)No.
5569 of 2018 in Crl.A(MD)No.317 of 2018 on the file of this Court.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :14.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
Crl.A.(MD).No.317 of 2018
Bala Murugan ... Appellant /Accused No.1
-vs-
State through
the Inspector of Police,
Oomatchikulam Police Station,
Oomatchikulam,
Madurai District
in Crime No.327 of 2021.
... Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., to
call for the entire records connected to the judgment in S.C.No.87
of 2014, on the file of V Additional Sessions Judge, Madurai, dated
09.03.2015 and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against
the appellant.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Alagumani
For Respondent : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar
Standing counsel for the State
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.)
Totally there are eight accused in this case and the appellant
is the first accused in S.C.No.87 of 2014, on the file of V
Additional Sessions Court, Madurai and they stood charged, which
reads as follows:
Charge No.
Rank of the accused
Charge under Section
1.
A1 to A8
147 IPC
2.
A1 to A8
148 IPC
3.
A2, A4 and A6
341 IPC
A8
341 IPC (2 counts)
1/13
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Crl.A.(MD).No.317 of 2018
4.
A1 and A2
302 IPC
5.
A1 to A8
506(ii) IPC
2. By judgment dated 09.03.2015, the trial Court has convicted
all the accused and sentenced them as follows:-
Rank of
the
accused
Convicte
d under
Section
Sentence
Imposed
Fine
Default
Sentence
A1 to
A8
147I.P.C
Rs.1000/
-(each)
3 Months
S.I.
A1 to A8 148I.P.C
Rs.1000/
- (each)
3 Months
S.I.
A2, A4,
A5 & A6
341I.P.C
Rs.300/-
(each)
2 Weeks
S.I.
A8
2341(ii)
I.P.C.
(2
counts)
Rs.300/-
(each)
2 Weeks
S.I.
A1 to A8 506(ii)
I.P.C.
Rs.1000/
-
(each)
3 Months
S.I.
A1 & A2
302I.P.C
.
Life
Imprisonment
Rs.5000/
-
(each)
6 Months
R.I.
A1 & A8
302 r/w.
149I.P.C
.
Life
Imprisonment
Rs.5000/
-
(each)
6 Months
R.I.
3. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, Accused Nos.3,
5 to 8, have separately filed Crl.A.(MD)No.94 of 2015 and a Division
Bench of this Court, by judgment dated 10.08.2015, allowed the
appeal and acquitted the accused. That apart, the Division Bench
has also extended the benefit of acquittal to A4 also, who has not
filed any appeal. For A2, even though he was convicted by the trial
Court, subsequently, on a Habeas Corpus Petition filed by him
claiming that he was a minor at the time of occurrence and he was
wrongly convicted by the Sessions Court, this Court set aside the
conviction and sentence imposed on A2. A1, the remaining accused is
before this Court with this appeal.
4. This is the case of double murder. The case of the
prosecution in brief is as follows:
The first deceased Manikandavelan (hereinafter referred to as
2/13
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Crl.A.(MD).No.317 of 2018
“D1”) is the son of P.W.1 and the second deceased Viswanathan
(hereinafter referred to as “D2”) is the husband of P.W.4. P.Ws.1
and 2, were running a tea stall, at Thirupalai Main Road, Madurai.
D2 was running a laundry shop near to the D1's tea shop. On
18.04.2011, D1's tea shop was closed, due to some festival at
Madurai. At about 3.00 p.m., P.W.1 received a phone call from a
water supplier to deliver drinking water cans to the shop. So,
P.W.1 sent the D1 to open the shop and receive the water cans. At
that time, all the eight accused sitting in front of the D1's shop
and indulged in eve-teasing, that was questioned by D1. At that
time, there was a quarrel and all the accused attacked D1.
Thereafter, D1 returned home, all the accused followed D1 up to his
house and crim