HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.ILANGOVAN
VELANKANNI A – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR – Respondent
WP(MD)/21440/2021
W.P.(MD)No.21440 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 28.02.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
W.P.(MD)No.21440 of 2021
A.Valankanni
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Assistant Director,
Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption,
Madurai.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Vigilance and Anti-Corruption,
Dindigul Detachment.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Vigilance and Anti-Corruption,
Dindigul District.
... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1
to 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's complaint dated
01.10.2021 in the light of the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government
of Uttar Pradesh & Ors, reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1 as expeditiously
as possible within the time stipulation as prescribed by this Court.
For Petitioner
: Mr.R.Anand
For Respondents
: Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus, directing the
respondents 1 to 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's
complaint dated 01.10.2021 in the light of the dictum laid down by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs.
Government of Uttar Pradesh & Ors, reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1 as
expeditiously as possible within the time stipulation.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned
Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the complaint given
by the petitioner has been forwarded to the District Collector,
1/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P.(MD)No.21440 of 2021
Dindigul District. Only based upon the communication from the
concerned District Collector further action can be taken.
3. Hence, the petitioner may wait for reasonable time for the
process to be completed. If even after waiting for reasonble time,
if no action is taken by the respondents, he can work out his remedy
through appropriate proceedings. It is seen that no time is
prescribed for completing the enquiry and file a report before the
respondents. So, as mentioned above, the petitioner can wait for
reasonable time. Depending upon the above said report further action
can be taken.
4. With the above liberty, this writ petition is disposed of.
No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (AE)
// True Copy //
/ /2022
Sub Assistant Registrar
NOTE:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a
web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,
ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct
copy,shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1. The Assistant Director,
Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption,
Madurai.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Vigilance and Anti-Corruption,
Dindigul Detachment.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Vigilance and Anti-Corruption,
Dindigul District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
W.P.(MD)No.21440 of 2021
28.02.2022
ebsi
MS/18.03.2022/2P.5C
2/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/