MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
RAMARAJ.N.S – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION – Respondent
WP(MD)/23170/2021
LAND ENCROACHMENT - NOTICE UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE TAMIL NADU LAND ENCROACHMENT ACT, 1905 - SUMMARY
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the notice issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, alleging that he had encroached upon a odai poromboke and put up a house and compound wall.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the petitioner to file his explanation to the impugned notice within two weeks and directed the authorities to consider the same after affording him an opportunity of personal hearing and pass appropriate orders under Section 6.
Issues: Whether the petitioner had encroached upon the odai poromboke and put up a house and compound wall.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner should have been given an opportunity to explain his position before an enquiry was conducted under Section 6 of the Act.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the authorities to consider the petitioner's explanation and pass appropriate orders under Section 6.
W.P(MD)No.23170 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 04.01.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
W.P(MD)No.23170 of 2021
and
WMP(MD)No.19602 of 2021
N.S.Ramaraj
... Petitioner
vs.
1) The Commissioner of Land Administration,
Land Administration Department,
2nd Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk,
Chennai.
2) The District Collector,
Virudhunagar District.
3) The Tahsildar,
Office of the Tahsildar,
Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.
4) The Sub Registrar,
Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.
5) Sub-Registrar,
Srivilliputtur, Virudhunagar District.
6) The Divisional Engineer,
State Highways,
Pachamadam, Rajapalayam,
Virudhunagar District.
... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of
the notice dated 16.12.2021 in Na.Ka.A6/7002/2020 of the 3rd
respondent herein and the proceedings dated 29.11.2021 in
Na.Ka.A6/7002/2020 of the 3rd respondent and to quash the same.
For Petitioner
: Mr.ARL.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel
for M/s.AL.Ganthimathi
For Respondents
: Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran
Additional Government Pleader
1/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P(MD)No.23170 of 2021
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)
The writ petition is directed against the notice issued under
Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905
[hereinafter 'the Act' for brevity]. The impugned notice states
that Survey No.1661/1 in Ayankollankondan 2 Village, Rajapalayam
Taluk, is a odai poromboke, in which, the petitioner has encroached
upon and put up a house and raised a compound wall to an extent of
721.82 square meters. Hence, the notice is issued calling upon him
to give explanation as to why he cannot be evicted from the said
premises.
2.
Normally, it is after giving reply by the petitioner in
this regard, an enquiry will be conducted under Section 6 of the
Act. Without resorting to enquiry under Section 6, the order has
been passed. The petitioner without even giving response to the
impugned notice, has rushed to this Court contending that all those
proceedings or documents or circulars referred to in the
proceedings of the Tahsildar, Rajapalayam, dated 29.11.2021 were
not furnished to him and unless they are furnished, he cannot give
a reply. Though the petitioner has stated in his affidavit that it
is his patta land having purchased the same on 20.12.1999, there
are no title deeds furnished in the typedset of papers.
3.
Be that as it may, the petitioner is directed to file his
explanation to the impugned notice within a period of two weeks
from today, to the authorities and the authorities are directed to
consider the same after affording him an opportunity of personal
hearing, pass appropriate orders under Section 6. Till such time
the enquiry is completed, the possession of the petitioner need not
be disturbed.
4.
With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed
of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
// True Copy //
/ /2022
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
bala
2/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P(MD)No.23170 of 2021
To
1) The Commissioner of Land Administration,
Land Administration Department,
2nd Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk,
Chennai.
2) The District Collector,
Virudhunagar District.
3) The Tahsildar,
Office of the Tahsildar,
Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.
4) The Sub Registrar,
Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.
5) Sub-Registrar,
Srivilliputtur, Virudhunagar District.
6) The Divisional Engineer,
State Highways,
Pachamadam, Rajapalayam,
Virudhunagar District.
+1 CC to M/s.AL.GANTHIMATHI, Advocate ( SR-238[F] dated
04/01/2022 )
+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-360[F] dated 05/01/2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.