SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
T.Karpagam – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector – Respondent
CRL OP(MD)/20940/2021



The Court has the power to quash criminal proceedings when the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the defacto complainant does not want to pursue the complaint.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 482 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS - PARTIES HAVE ARRIVED AT AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT AND THE DEAFCTO COMPLAINANT DOES NOT WANT TO PURSUE THE COMPLAINT - NO PURPOSE WILL BE SERVED IN KEEPING THE IMPUGNED PROSECUTION ALIVE - IMPUGNED PROCEEDINGS ARE QUASHED.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed a criminal original petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.85 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai District. The defacto complainant/Kannammal was present before the Court through video conferencing and she categorically stated that she did not want to pursue the complaint.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the parties had arrived at an amicable settlement and the defacto complainant did not want to pursue the complaint. The Court held that no purpose would be served in keeping the impugned prosecution alive and quashed the impugned proceedings.

Issues: Whether the impugned proceedings should be quashed when the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the defacto complainant does not want to pursue the complaint.

Ratio Decidendi: When the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the defacto complainant does not want to pursue the complaint, no purpose will be served in keeping the impugned prosecution alive.

Final Decision: The impugned proceedings were quashed.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.20940 of 2021

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 10.01.2022

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

Crl.O.P(MD)No.20940 of 2021

1.T.Karpagam

2.M.Thondeeswaran

...Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 & 2

Vs.

1.The State rep. by

The Inspector of Police,

Central Crime Branch,

Madurai City.

(Crime No.65 of 2016)

...Respondent/Claimant

2.R.Kannammal

... Respondent/Defacto Complainant

Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482

of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records pertaining to the case in

(*)C.C.No.85 of 2017 pending on the file of the learned (*)Judicial

Magistrate No.I, Madurai District and quash the as against the

petitioners.

For Petitioners

: Mr.R.Anand

For Respondents

: Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar,

Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1.

Mr.A.R.M.Ramesh for R2

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed for quashing the

proceedings in (*)C.C.No.85 of 2017 on the file of the (*)Judicial

Magistrate No.I, Madurai District.

2.The defacto complainant/Kannammal is present before this

Court through video conferencing. She has been duly identified by

Mr.C.Periyakaruppan, Sub Inspector of Police attached to first

respondent police station. The parties have filed a memo of joint

compromise. The defacto complainant categorically states before this

Court that she does not want to pursue the complaint. When the

parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the deafcto

complainant does not want to pursue the complaint, no purpose will

be served in keeping the impugned prosecution alive. The impugned

1/2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Crl.O.P(MD)No.20940 of 2021

proceedings are quashed. The criminal original petition is

allowed. The memo of joint compromise will form part of the order.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

(*)Amended as per order of this

Hon'ble Court dated 11.02.2022

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

// True Copy //

/ /2022

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

ias

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to

COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be

utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that

the copy of the order that is presented is the

correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the

advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

(*)To be Substituted the order already despatched

on 02.02.2022

(*)1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I,

Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police,

Central Crime Branch,

Madurai City.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor,

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai.

+1cc to M/S.R.ANAND, ADVOCATE, Sr.No.6054 DATED:14.02.2022

Crl.O.P(MD)No.20940 of 2021

10.01.2022

CK(CO)

KB(01.02.2022) 2P 4C

CK(CO)

GC(01.03.2022) 2P 5C

2/2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top