HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.ILANGOVAN
S. ISAC RATHINA RAJ, – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE – Respondent
WP(MD)/20517/2018
W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 30.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018
S.Isac Rathina Raj
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Director General of Police,
South Zone,
Madurai.
2.The Superintendent of Police,
Palayamkottai,
Tirunelveli District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Tirunelveli Junction Palam Police Station,
Tirunelveli District.
4.Stanley Sargunam
.. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of
India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1
to 3 to take appropriate action against the wrong doer, the 4th
respondent by restraining him from using the premises for illegal
purposes and against public peace, in Survey Nos.852, 853, comprises
928.12 sq. ft. and 20 cents of vacant site situated in T.S.Ward
No.11, Veeraragavapuram, East Street, Tirunelveli, based on the
petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2018.
For Petitioner
: No Appearance
For Respondents
: Mr.R.Sivakumar
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
(This writ petition is heard through video conference)
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the
respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the wrong
doer, the 4th respondent by restraining him from using the premises
for illegal purposes and against public peace, in Survey Nos.852,
853, comprises 928.12 sq. ft. and 20 cents of vacant site situated
in T.S.Ward No.11, Veeraragavapuram, East Street, Tirunelveli, based
1/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018
on the petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2018.
2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.11.2021, there
was no representation for the petitioner and the third respondent
was present before the Court in person and submitted that the
petitioner appeared before the Enquiry Officer and gave an
undertaking to workout their remedy through civil proceedings. Based
upon that it came to be closed. Since there was no representation
for the petitioner on that day, the case has been ordered to be
listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'
3.Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Since the representation came to be closed on the basis of the
undertaking and there is no representation for the petitioner, this
Writ Petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
// True Copy //
/ /2022
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
TM
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic,
a web copy of the order may be utilized for official
purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is
presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility
of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Director General of Police,
South Zone,
Madurai.
2.The Superintendent of Police,
Palayamkottai,
Tirunelveli District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Tirunelveli Junction Palam Police Station,
Tirunelveli District.
W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018
30.11.2021
SAR(CO)
KB(03.01.2022) 2P 4C
2/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/