SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.ILANGOVAN
S. ISAC RATHINA RAJ, – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE – Respondent
WP(MD)/20517/2018



W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 30.11.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018

S.Isac Rathina Raj

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Director General of Police,

South Zone,

Madurai.

2.The Superintendent of Police,

Palayamkottai,

Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police,

Tirunelveli Junction Palam Police Station,

Tirunelveli District.

4.Stanley Sargunam

.. Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of

India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1

to 3 to take appropriate action against the wrong doer, the 4th

respondent by restraining him from using the premises for illegal

purposes and against public peace, in Survey Nos.852, 853, comprises

928.12 sq. ft. and 20 cents of vacant site situated in T.S.Ward

No.11, Veeraragavapuram, East Street, Tirunelveli, based on the

petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2018.

For Petitioner

: No Appearance

For Respondents

: Mr.R.Sivakumar

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

(This writ petition is heard through video conference)

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the

respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the wrong

doer, the 4th respondent by restraining him from using the premises

for illegal purposes and against public peace, in Survey Nos.852,

853, comprises 928.12 sq. ft. and 20 cents of vacant site situated

in T.S.Ward No.11, Veeraragavapuram, East Street, Tirunelveli, based

1/2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018

on the petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2018.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.11.2021, there

was no representation for the petitioner and the third respondent

was present before the Court in person and submitted that the

petitioner appeared before the Enquiry Officer and gave an

undertaking to workout their remedy through civil proceedings. Based

upon that it came to be closed. Since there was no representation

for the petitioner on that day, the case has been ordered to be

listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'

3.Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

Since the representation came to be closed on the basis of the

undertaking and there is no representation for the petitioner, this

Writ Petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

// True Copy //

/ /2022

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

TM

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic,

a web copy of the order may be utilized for official

purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is

presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility

of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The Director General of Police,

South Zone,

Madurai.

2.The Superintendent of Police,

Palayamkottai,

Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police,

Tirunelveli Junction Palam Police Station,

Tirunelveli District.

W.P.(MD).No.20517 of 2018

30.11.2021

SAR(CO)

KB(03.01.2022) 2P 4C

2/2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top