MADRAS HIGH COURT - MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Satheesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Superintendent of Police – Respondent
CRL A(MD) 782/2022
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 29/11/2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
Crl.A(MD)No.782 of 2022
1.Sathees Kumar
2.Subramanian : Appellants/Petitioner/
A1 and A2
Vs.
1.The State represented by
The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Nilakottai Sub Division,
Dindigul District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Batlagundu Police Station,
Dindigul District.
(Crime No.382 of 2022) : R1 and R2/Complainants
3.Vellaisamy : R3/R3/De-facto Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under section 14-
A(2) of SC/ST Act, to call for the entire records
pertaining to the order passed by the Special Judge for
Exclusive trial cases under ST/ST (POA) Act, Dindigul, in
Cr.M.P No.1582 of 2022, dated 18/10/2022 and set aside
the same and consequently, enlarge the appellants on bail
in connection with the case in Crime No.382 of 2022 on
the file of the Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police
Station, Dindigul District and pass such any or other
orders.
For Appellant : Mr.P.Saravanan
For R1 and R2 : Mr.SS.Madhavan
Government Advocate
(Crimnal side)
For 3rd Respondent : Mrs.N.Juliet Latha
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
J U D G M E N T
This Criminal Appeal has been filed seeking to set
aside the order, dated 18/10/2022 made in Cr.M.P No.1582
of 2022 on the file of the Special Judge for Exclusive
Trial cases under SC/ST (POA) Act cases, Dindigul and
enlarge the appellants on bail.
2.The case of the prosecution in brief:-
On 08/10/2022, the de-facto complainant went to
Sendraya Perumal Temple along with his family members
leaving his elder daughter by name Prabha in his house.
At about 2.30 pm, when he returned to his house, his
daughter Prabha committed suicide by hanging in the
ceiling fan with her saree. On the basis of the complaint
given by the de-facto complainant, a case in Crime in
Crime No.382 of 2022 was registered for the offence under
section 174 Cr.P.C @ 294(b), 306 IPC and section 3(2)(va)
of SC/ST(POA) Act, 2015 against the accused persons.
3.Now the first appellant was arrested on
10/10/2022 and the second appellant was arrested on
11/10/2022 and remanded to judicial custody and ever-
since, they are in custody. Seeking bail, they moved
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3
Crl.MP(MD)No.1582 of 2022 before the Special Court and
that came to be dismissed, on 18/10/2022 considering the
gravity of the offence. Challenging the above said
dismissal order, this criminal appeal has been preferred.
4.Heard both sides.
5.The date of occurrence is stated to be on
26/09/2022. No doubt that there was some serious
allegation against the appellants to the effect that they
created circumstances, which drove the deceased to commit
suicide.
6.Even though, it has been contended on behalf of
the appellants that A2 was a salesman in a fair-price
shop at the time of the above said occurrence, on the
particular day and time, he was not available in the
place of occurrence and he was attending the duty in the
fair-price shop. So according to him, A2 namely the
second appellant has been wrongly roped in this case.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4
7.So far as A1 namely the 1st appellant is
concerned, it has been stated that on 26/09/2002, the
earlier complaint was given and during the course of the
above said enquiry, the first appellant appeared before
the Enquiry Officer and submitted that he never loved the
deceased. The CSR number is 804 of 2022. The above said
complaint was closed on the ground that there was
compromise between the parties. The date of closure of
the complainant is 26/09/2022 and the present occurrence
stated to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.